My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 01 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2006-2019 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 01 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:46:11 AM
Creation date
2/1/2019 10:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
UCPKT 2019 01 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Utility Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Friday, November 9, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann inquired about the note related to the constraints in <br />operating the raw water pipeline and if these were resolved. Mr. Peterson <br />explained that the solution is still in progress and is related to the intake control <br />vault project that is currently under design and anticipated construction in early <br />2019. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann went on to ask about the chart that shows usage and <br />wanted to know if 2012 would be considered a drought. Mr. Peterson answered <br />yes 2012 along with 2002 and 2016 would be representative of drought years. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann referred to the graph on climate change and <br />questioned why increases demands are not shown in fall. Mr. Peterson explained <br />the climate information was based on referenced work in the Front Range <br />Vulnerability Study, which did not predict a significant change to prompt a change <br />in demand in these months. Mr. Kowar went on to explain other models have <br />shown higher impacts in the fall but varies at other times in the year. Staff will <br />continue to monitoring the ongoing research in this area and update accordingly. <br />XII. Windy Gap <br />Mr. Peterson stated the financial rating for the joint financing was provided at an <br />A+ two tiers below the AA rating projected. In addition, a new construction cost <br />estimated is expected later this year. Lastly, with the delay in construction <br />Northern is proposing a 4th Amendment to the 5th Agreement to keep funding going <br />in 2019. Staff plans to bring this forward for approval in the next couple of months. <br />Councilmember Keany asked if this will impact the rates. Mr. Peterson said this <br />was a more shifting the timing of funds and would not increase the overall funding <br />estimated. <br />XIII. Upcoming Projects <br />Mr. Peterson provide a brief update on upcoming Council approvals related to: <br />SCWTP Tube Settlers Replacement, Louisville Pipeline Control Vault, Consulting <br />Engineer Renewal, SWSP Transmission Design, SCWTP Building Upgrades, <br />SCWTP disinfection design and Windy Gap Financing. <br />XIV. Adjourn <br />The meeting was adjourned at 4:00 pm. A tour of the Howard Berry Water <br />Treatment Plant was held following the meeting. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.