My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 01 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2006-2019 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 01 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:46:11 AM
Creation date
2/1/2019 10:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
UCPKT 2019 01 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Utility Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Friday, November 9, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />X. Water Resources/Water Supply Update <br />Mr. Peterson outlined the US drought monitoring attached illustrating the extreme <br />drought conditions in the southwest corner of the state. The City's watershed is a <br />slight to moderate drought area which is within the range of normal conditions and <br />is similar to conditions in 2016. If dry conditions continue through the winter and <br />snow pack levels do not improve drought water restrictions are a possibility for next <br />year. Mr. Peterson cautioned that these results are early in the process as the <br />snowiest months for Colorado are still to come in April and May. Councilmember <br />Keany queried if the City should be considering winter restrictions. Mr. Peterson <br />stated that storage levels are within normal levels and winter restrictions are not <br />recommended. <br />Councilmember Loo inquired to when Windy Gap will come on line. Mr. Peterson <br />explained that Windy Gap has a projected construction schedule of 4 years and <br />current estimate are to start next year in 2019 and be complete in 2023. Filling the <br />reservoir will depend on water availability at this time and flexibility during <br />construction for preliminary filling. Mr. Peterson provide an update on the status <br />of the other aspects of Windy Gap related to the construction. Mr. Kowar went on <br />to say that Louisville has been very proactive in assembling various water rights <br />over the years putting Louisville in a flexible position to respond to drought <br />conditions in a variety of ways. <br />Councilmember Keany asked if the City should still be open to other water rights. <br />Mr. Kowar responded that while staff are not aggressively pursuing water rights <br />the City is active and able to acquire water rights that become available. <br />XI. Master Plan Review <br />Mr. Peterson outlined that the raw water long term CIPs are based on the <br />recommendation contained within the approved master plan. Mr. Kowar stated <br />this discussion was designed as a refresher and ensuring the current direction is <br />still appropriate. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked about the any recent activities for reuse and raw <br />water specifically related to the golf course. Mr. Kowar said there is a related <br />internal memo that will be finalized and provided to the committee. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann sought clarification about the City's return flow <br />obligations. Mr. Peterson provide the background on how the City meets return <br />flow associated with the City water rights. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann requested a review of the water rights in Marshall <br />Lake. Mr. Peterson outlined that the City is the largest shareholder followed by <br />Broomfield and Boulder County. Mr. Peterson stated that the City has a good <br />relationship with FRICO as the owner and operator of Marshall Lake. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if dredging activities were performed at Marshall <br />how would costs and benefits be distributed. Mr. Peterson stated that discussions <br />are still ongoing with FRICO but it is typical that the benefits would be prorated <br />proportional to funds invested. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.