Laserfiche WebLink
railroad tracks, were grounds for not pursuing the prosecution. Relative to Mr. Martin, Mr. Joss felt that <br />there may have been prosecutable grounds to proceed, however, also there was a gap of time from the <br />time that he lef~ the American Legion. Based upon those findings, Mr. Joss contacted the representatives <br />from the American Legion. Mr. Joss stated that they were quite cooperative and very interested in <br />addressing the issues. As indicated in the police report, the bartender did volunteer that he had not <br />receive any liquor code training. The American Legion has been quite responsive to address that and has <br />voluntarily agreed to training classes, not only for immediate staffbut for the Executive Board that <br />oversees the operations of the Club. He felt that this was a step in the right direction, and asked the <br />Authority to approve the Stipulation and Agreement. <br /> <br />Lipton asked Mr. Joss what determined the date of closure? <br /> <br />Joss stated that he agreed that the American Legion one day closure should af~er the holidays, due to <br />their heavy schedule of pre-arranged banquets and facility bookings. <br /> <br />Myers asked Mr. Joss why the two days were held in abeyance for six months, as opposed to one year. <br /> <br />Joss stated that the two days held in abeyance for only six months was a result of the weakness of the <br />facts of the case. He reiterated the gaps in time and the lack of witnesses who would come forward and <br />testify. <br /> <br />Chairperson Jeffers asked if the representatives from the American Legion Club would like to address the <br />Authority. <br /> <br />George Plumley, American Legion member stated that he have met with Mr. Joss in selection of the <br />January 7, 1999 suspension date. He noted that all of the weekends were previously booked with <br />weddings, anniversaries and holiday parties. The club chose a date that would not impact previously <br />booked activities. Mr. Plumley noted that he and other club members had attended the last liquor training <br />in Louisville. <br /> <br />Attorney Light outlined the procedure, which includes two motions. The first motion would be to <br />approve or deny the proposed Stipulation and Agreement. If the motion were to approve that doCUment, <br />then a second motion would be requked to approve the Order for Suspension. <br /> <br />Discussion on the Motion: <br /> <br />Jeffers stated that he was pleased with the American Legion's willingness to work with the Authority in <br />resolving this matter, and their commitment to alcohol training, however, he noted that he was in favor of <br />a longer suspension. <br /> <br />Lipton noted that she was concerned by statements in the police reports made by the bartender and other <br />clients that patrons were served when apparently intoxicated. She would encourage continued training. <br /> <br />CliffKonold, American Legion representative, commented that clubs licenses are much more than a bar. <br /> <br /> <br />