My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2020 06 23 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2020 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2020 06 23 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:15:16 PM
Creation date
7/29/2020 10:58:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/23/2020
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 23, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />There were two fiscal models developed in 2014, the Development Impact Model which <br />provides marginal / average cost hybrid for individual development proposals; and, the <br />Area Planning Model which shows the marginal cost model for citywide or area land use <br />scenarios. Director Zuccaro reviewed the 2018 policy and standard assumptions which <br />are used for residential and commercial properties. He showed examples of a high / low <br />assumption model and how it would be used. <br />Public Comments <br />RJ Harrington, 457 Raintree Court, thinks that the fiscal impact analysis should also show <br />social and environmental benefits or the lack thereof. He asked if those impacts could be <br />considered in future fiscal impact analysis. <br />Sherry Sommer, 910 South Palisade, asked how residential development is framed. She <br />wants to know if the true cost of residential building is calculated correctly. <br />Mayor Stolzmann noted this tool does not calculate the environmental costs or benefits <br />from development. The Comprehensive Plan does address some environmental issues, <br />but this tool is specifically designed to analyze the impacts to the City's budget. <br />Stolzmann also stated that this shows an estimate of the spending of residential and <br />business people in the community. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Maloney stated the City has many tools to use to analyze data and they <br />all should be used. <br />Councilmember Fahey asked if different demographics were taken into consideration for <br />this analysis. Zuccaro stated different demographic spending trends were not broken out <br />for this analysis. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1795, SERIES 2020 — AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE EXTENDING <br />TO AUGUST 30, 2020 THE REQUIREMENT TO WEAR FACE COVERINGS WITHIN <br />THE CITY — 1ST AND FINAL READING — PUBLIC HEARING — Adoption as <br />Emergency Ordinance <br />Mayor Stolzmann introduced the item and opened the public hearing. <br />City Manager Balser reviewed the recommendations from the State, Boulder County, and <br />the Department of Public Health to extend the face covering requirement to August 30, <br />2020. <br />Public Comments <br />RJ Harrington, 457 Raintree Court, voiced his support and stated be believes the <br />community supports this as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.