My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1983 10 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1983 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1983 10 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:21 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 3:35:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/4/1983
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1983 10 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10/4/83 <br /> <br />Page -12- <br /> <br />and reductions so as to provide a few hundred <br />thousand dollars contingency in the City <br />Council budget for the Downtown Redevelopment <br />which has been accomplished. An explanation <br />of the reductions and increases in revenue <br />is enclosed. <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Newly Proposed positions <br /> <br />Commented perhaps he had a different interpre- <br />tation of the instructions. Did not feel the <br />goal was to establish $200,000 in a contingency <br />fund, but rather to eliminate $200,000 from <br />the budget. His review was that $100,000 <br />was deleted and wished an explanation of <br />the items that were cut by the $100,000; also <br />show which of the newly proposed positions <br />have been recommended for being deleted from <br />the budget. Reiterated he still felt that <br />another $100,000 should be deleted from the <br />budget - the reason being the budget was not <br />to be overly dependent upon growth revenues <br />in the General Fund. <br />Administrator Wurl advised that the total <br />reduction was actually total $134,096 which <br />included going from the 7% to 5% step increase. <br />Leary stated the $200,000 was not to include <br />the 2% step increase. <br />Administrator Wurl stated it was his under- <br />standing that the majority of the Council <br />was supportive of the $200,000 for the down- <br />town development and his and the department <br />heads instructions were to review and find <br />this sum of money. Felt that most of the <br />cuts that were made were those suggested by <br />Councilman Leary. <br />Asti-Caranci <br />Director of Financial Services/then explained <br />the cuts in the items in each of the depart- <br />ment's budget. In reply to Councilman Leary's <br />inquiry stated 11 new positions had been left <br />in the General Fund. Also the deficit in the <br />Water Distribution buget would be $221,000.00 <br />which included the Plant Operator. <br />Councilman Leary requested an estimate of how <br />much the 11 General Fund staff add to the <br />General Fund expenditures. The reply was <br />approximately $180,000.00. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Continued <br /> <br />Mayor Meier continued the public hearing and <br />asked if there was anyone in the audience <br />in favor of Resolution #38 adopting the budget. <br />None. Asked if there was anyone in opposition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.