Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CONCEDED TWO LOTS FOR <br />ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE <br /> <br />Al Perenyi, 739 W. Dahlia Dr. <br /> <br />Jane Monson, 631 W. Aspen <br />Court <br /> <br />3/15/83 <br /> <br />Page -8- <br /> <br />Discussion with councilmembers and developers. <br />Consensus of the council did not favor the <br />400 series homes - felt that all levels of <br />housing should be presented in the subdivision, <br />more emphasis should be placed on kind of <br />housing and kind of subdivision meets the <br />maximum needs of the city. Lot 56 adj acent <br />to Mr. Steve Grosnec needed to be resolved <br />before approval could be given. None of the <br />council were in favor of the screening be- <br />tween the two series of homes. Suggested <br />a need for a panel over the ditch for access <br />to the park; also tot-lots should be con- <br />structed as well as the large park. Felt <br />there was a need for more compaction of soil <br />around the homes to prevent sinking of porches <br />and sidewalks. <br />agreed <br />The developer/to concede the two extra lots <br />as discussed by council for additional open <br />space and possible tot lot. <br /> <br />Advised that he was one of the persons who <br />had contacted the homeowners within the <br />area of the proposed Heritage II subdivision <br />and with the exception of 4 who weren't at <br />home, all were in favor of the P.D.D. as <br />presented this evening. It was his feeling <br />if council approved the resolution, adjusting <br />lot 56 adjacent to Mr. Grosnec's property, <br />accepting the two additional lots offered <br />by the developer, taking care of the swale <br />in the ditch, etc. everyone would be happy <br />with the proposed subdivision and the develop- <br />ment could proceed without having to return <br />to the Planning Commission and again back <br />to City Council. <br /> <br />Stated she also was one of the persons <br />that canvassed the neighborhood on Saturday <br />and explained the proposed plan that was <br />brought before council this evening. All <br />except Mr. Groesnec were satisfied with it. <br />One of the concerns now in talking about <br />squeezing that lot down, is that some of <br />the homeowners backing up to those lots are <br />going to end up with more lots in back of <br />their homes. Also, if the developer would <br />enlarge Tract B by removing 2 lots, the home- <br />owners would be happy with this. <br />