My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1983 02 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1983 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1983 02 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:21 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 4:37:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/15/1983
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1983 02 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2/15/83 <br /> <br />Page -2- <br /> <br />fund remedial action at the Marshall Landfill. <br />Felt there was substantial movement in that <br />area and would stand ready to assist in the <br />situation. Will keep us up-to-date on this <br />critical area. <br />Another important issue he felt was im- <br />portant was the State's tax cuts which would <br />impact municipalities. One exception <br />was the Highway Users Tax fund where exemptions <br />were given to County and Municipal governments, <br />from the budget cuts. If Council wished to <br />have information about other budget cuts he <br />asked to please let him know. Looked for- <br />ward to working with us during the next <br />several months. <br /> <br />Councilman Cussen <br />Lottery Funds <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br />S.B. 174 - Initiative and <br />Referendum Procedures <br /> <br />Commented they had discussed briefly about <br />the rumors in relation to the budget deficit <br />for the state, the possibility of funds <br />being used from the lottery. He inquired - <br />was the portion designated for parks and <br />recreation and open space acquisition being <br />considered to fund capital improvements or <br />other projects? <br />Representative Hume felt that presently the <br />lottery money for parks and open space was <br />in tact; although conditions are changing <br />rapidly. The Legislature cannot sustain <br />a deficit constitutionally and this is the <br />crux of the problem. Stated possibly during <br />the fourth quarter any funds, such as the <br />lottery would be vu1ernab1e to change and <br />arise as a topic of discussion. Advised <br />that he would oppose such a change; however <br />if sentiment builds towards using these funds <br />for other purposes it would be difficult to <br />stop that kind of movement. Would keep us <br />up-to-date on this situation. <br /> <br />Commented this Senate Bill was obnoxious to <br />him because it made initiative and referen- <br />dum more difficult by raising the signature <br />requirements. Essentially he viewed this <br />as an attempt to move power from the people <br />to government.and it is an affront on democ- <br />racy; felt that the right of initiative and <br />referendum is possibly the most basic right <br />that people have reserved for them. Was <br />interested to know what Representative Hume's <br />position was on this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.