Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/3/82 <br /> <br />Page -4- <br /> <br />Schelene Stratton <br />1123 Lincoln Ave. <br /> <br />Felt that the $100 fee for each machine at <br />the Pinball Wizard was unreasonable. She <br />stated that she had been to many arcades <br />and spoke with several owners of arcades. <br />They informed her either that they paid <br />a small fee or no fee at all - most of the <br />owners were in the Boulder area. Boulder <br />has several arcades while Louisville only <br />has one. She further stated the Pinball <br />Wizard is a very clean building; there is <br />always an attendant on duty; is very orderly. <br />She was there frequently and enjoyed the games. <br />It was her feeling that if the $100 fee per <br />machine was adopted, it could force the owner <br />to close the business, and did not feel Louis" <br />ville was the type City that would force <br />someone out of business. It was her opinion <br />that the surrounding businesses also realized <br />customers from the the people who .played the <br />video games. Cited instances of people who <br />were doing their laundry and played the games <br />until it was finished. Felt that the busi- <br />ness was keeping people within the City. <br />Felt that $25.00 per machine would be ample, <br />and that it was keeping the young adults off <br />the streets and out of trouble. Again reiter- <br />ated the advantage of entertainment for the <br />families. <br /> <br />Mayor Meier continued the public hearing. <br />Anyone else in the audience that wished to <br />speak in opposition of the ordinance - none. <br />Council comments. <br /> <br />Councilman Cussen <br /> <br />Commented he realized that after reviewing <br />the revenue and expenditure sheets provided <br />by the owner of the Pinball Wizard, that the <br />business was not making a large profit. How- <br />ever councilmembers were viewing all arcades <br />and although he was sympathetic to the conerns, <br />there were still issues that needed to be <br />addressed, i.e. he would be willing to con- <br />sider a $75 per machine fee, in lieu of the <br />$100 as stated in the ordinance. Expressed <br />concern about bicycles cluttering the doorway, <br />pedestrians who are walking stumble over them - <br />where is the liability? The City provides <br />police protection and. other services thus the <br />reason for the fee. It was his feeling a bike <br />rack was a priority for the establishment. <br />