My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 11 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 11 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:20 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 3:15:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
11/3/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 11 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Mayor Meier <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />ORDINANCE #767 - VIDEO <br />GAMES - PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />Mrs. Carol Kelly - Co-owner <br />Pinball Wizard <br />In Opposition <br /> <br />11/3/82 <br /> <br />Page -3- <br /> <br />outline of the history of the leachate problem. <br />This will be done either through the Louisville <br />Times or sent to the residents. <br /> <br />Requested this report be placed on the agenda <br />for the next council meeting thus allowing <br />people to ask further questions and council <br />discussion. <br /> <br />Advised if councilmembers wished further <br />information on the leachate problem, it was <br />available from staff. <br /> <br />Attorney Rautenstraus read the ordinance by <br />title only on second reading and public hearing; <br />also certified proper publication. <br /> <br />Mayor Meier opened the public hearing and <br />Attorney Rautenstraus advised that notice of <br />the public hearing was published in the <br />Louisville Times October 13, 1982. Rautenstraus <br />also advised that amendments to the ordinance <br />on first reading had been published. <br />Mayor Meier asked if there was anyone in favor <br />of the ordinance. None. <br />Anyone in opposition to the ordinance. <br />Stated the fee of $100.00 per machine is <br />excessive and that she had provided copies of <br />her profit and loss statement to councilmembers. <br />She suggested a fee of $25.00 per machine as <br />more feasible. Stated that her husband has <br />been ill and in the hospital requiring her to <br />hire addtional help, which again cut into the <br />profits. This is their only source of income. <br />~he range or revnue realized from each machine <br />was from $25.00 - $85.00 per week. The machines <br />are enjoyed by families, young adults and resi- <br />dents of the City. It was her opin'ion that <br />machines in bars and grocery stores perhaps <br />did realize revenue of $350.00 per week, per <br />machine and most of them did not have to pay <br />rent nor utilities. She commented the $700.00 <br />she would be required to pay by ordinance could <br />be used for remodeling or buying bike racks, etc. <br />She requested that councilmembers please con- <br />sider amending the ordinance to reduce the <br />fees - had no problem with the rest of the <br />ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.