My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1997 03 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1997 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1997 03 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:42 PM
Creation date
4/7/2004 11:29:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
3/4/1997
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1997 03 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Keany did not see why the condition of limiting the number of night employees was not wanted on <br />the PUD. <br /> <br />Sisk wanted Wood to state the City's position as to whether there is a use by right to 80,000 sf. <br />of facility on the property. <br /> <br />Wood explained that the building envelope was not vested either by document or agreement or by <br />the site plan to give them 82,000 sf. additional. The agreements further require the applicant, at the <br />time of any further addition, to come back through a PUD Development Plan process. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if Neodata would be willing to indicate hours and days of construction. <br /> <br />Johnston agreed. He pointed out that in the event of weather or delays there might be a need to work <br />on weekends. <br /> <br />Sisk wanted the drainage on the northeast comer addressed by engineers. He wanted carpooling <br />addressed also. <br /> <br />Lathrop felt the concerns revolved around disturbance: noise, lights, construction dust, etc. He <br />suggested that staff develop some phraseology that would be acceptable to the applicants to go on <br />the PUD saying that the City Administrator would bring any issue to Council that he could not <br />resolve with their management related to off-site disturbance. The remedies could be up to and <br />including a limitation on employees, which would only occur if there was a real problem. <br /> <br />Mayer wanted to know how many delivery trucks arrived per day. <br /> <br />Johnston thought one or two and maybe some days none. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant's summary. <br /> <br />Johnston looked forward to making the project work well for everyone. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments. <br /> <br />Keany felt Neodata wanted to be and is a good citizen of Louisville. He thought Lathrop's <br />suggestion would address future concerns and allow the City to keep control and maintain a presence <br />in the future of the way the facility is administered and cared for. <br /> <br />Mayer was concerned about what the facility could turn into in the future, not so much the simple <br />increase of today's operations, but Neodata's reluctance to limit the nighttime employees to 125, <br />which would be about a 500% increase over what is there now. He wanted a dust mitigation plan <br />submitted to the City. He wanted a limitation on semi-trailer traffic, so the character that is currently <br />there be maintained. Also, if a traffic light would someday be required, that Neodata be required to <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.