Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />JUNE 11, 2009 <br />Page 7 of 14 <br />Hartman had questions about visitor parking. <br />Wood stated it would be permitted on the street, limited availability on the site <br />and no parking on the alley. <br />Russell discussed the maintenance of the alley. <br />Wood stated the alley would be public ROW and maintained by the City. The <br />applicant, as with all other applications, will be required to provide the.signage. <br />Tengler asked staff if the proposal would have more or fewer cars to park on site <br />then the previous uses of the property. <br />Wood stated it would be probably be fewer cars because,t ere are fewer <br />structures. <br />Wood requested the Commission enter into pubIid record`i e`following emails <br />and letters that have been received regarding Ah eproject:\ <br />Name <br />Address <br />support <br />Against <br />Nancy Cooley <br />Business owner <br />6( <br />Fred Bacher <br />520 Main <br /># <br />Tim & Amy Hancock <br />500 Grant <br />X e <br />Dave Dutch <br />5Main <br />Kara Reese <br />Bum se owner <br />. <br />\ <br />. <br />Patrica Ehman & Crul Keres <br />Unknov n <br />C' •S,- <br />" <br />U <br />Loo moved and Tenger seconded a m tion to enter those items into public <br />record. Motion p4 ed by vola.e vote. \ <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Garrett Mundelein, 520Maln'St eet � 'Ile, CO used a visual program that <br />provided rwalk through.of-the site. He continued with a discussion of each <br />condition of approv : I" Folio'' ing is a brief note regarding each condition: <br />litOr.FWill continue work Staff to resolve the public use dedication. <br />2)"grees to reque'ted modifications to reflect the rear setback waivers. <br />3) Requesting a FA Hof .45 <br />4) Agrees �t oremov, - mote #13 on the Improvement Survey Plat. <br />5) Agrees o ,removg�dashed lines representing building envelop and <br />footprint. <br />6) Proposed a odified demolitation process. The plan would allow for his <br />company to use one of the buildings as an office during the development <br />process. <br />7) Agrees to remove Unit 2 of Building One from the drainage easement. <br />8) Discussed the fire rating and the sprinkling of the buildings. Requested the <br />removal of this condition. <br />9) Agrees with requested setback and building separation correction. <br />10) Agrees with additional note regarding no parking in the alley. <br />11) Agrees with requested landscape modification. <br />