Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />JUNE 11, 2009 <br />Page 8 of 14 <br />12) Requested a clarification as to why the need for two surveys. Staff <br />explained it is a requirement of FEMA and the Flood Plain Development <br />Permit that was approved for a portion of the property. <br />13) Agrees to amend note regarding fencing. <br />14) Agrees to amend table. <br />15) Agrees to the requested correction of dimensional inconsistencies. <br />Mundelein continued with a discussion ofhis energy conservation building <br />practices as well as his job site management. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Hartman requested Mundelein provide more detail of tl�e e'rgy saving <br />measures and what he means by historic character. <br />Mundelein highlighted a few of the energy saving {�raetices insulated <br />foundation, insulated concrete form, cotton insulation and bloken soy based <br />insulation. His discussion of historic charactef focused on the exterior, as well as <br />some interior features. He stated that th hood plain has created -some design <br />issues as well as the 27' height limit. The height knit i why he is req sting a <br />waiver. <br />Russell asked why the `crows nest feature had. een included. <br />Mundelein stated it was only a d g eature and ovided no other purpose. <br />Russell and Mundelein continued w thh a discussion of'tw9 conditions. Condition <br />#8 is regarding the setback and buildingsepar`atio&while Condition #12 <br />addresses the Flood'Plain�D velopmeni'Permit and -the number of required <br />surveys. <br />Tengler requeste�clarriific�ofi df th�Y ,Ting and building separation. <br />Wood stated-if_the bpi din . s are 1O-a p arthen no fire ratingis required. The <br />9/ p� q <br />condi� � at-th\ � es\ f\ a Fire District. <br />Russel discussed with Woo d the requirement of a 2nd elevation certificate. <br />Wood\at d the requuir rent is FEMA requirement because of the <br />developrren.\ithin the lo) d plain. <br />Mundelein state \e/wo'd agree to the 2nd elevation requirement. <br />Hartman discusssed4 th Wood the request for the .45 FAR when the .42 FAR <br />was a condition of'City Council during the preliminary review. <br />Wood stated that staff supports the applicants request because the actual <br />footprint of the building does not change. The change is the result of a lot SF <br />reduction. <br />Members of the Public: <br />Betsy Kessler, 156 S. Filmore Ave., Louisville, CO discussed her recent tour of <br />the duplex that is currently under construction. She stated the housing type will <br />attract people to Louisville. <br />