Laserfiche WebLink
Yes <br />Request 4 <br />This request changes the existing <br />rear elevation of the house by <br />extending the roof and footprint of <br />the house by 5 feet. The proposed <br />siding and window design <br />differentiates the proposed addition <br />from the historic/existing portion of <br />the house and represents a minimal <br />impact to the general historical and <br />architectural character of the <br />structure and property. <br />Yes <br />Requests 5 & 6 <br />These changes update the existing <br />carport addition, added in the late <br />1970s/1980s. Staff finds that the <br />carport does not achieve historic <br />significance through age or design <br />and that the proposed changes <br />differentiate the appearance of the <br />updated addition from the historic <br />portion of the house. <br />2. The architectural style, arrangement, <br />Yes <br />Requests 1, 2, & 3 <br />texture, and material used on the existing <br />The proposed restoration work <br />and proposed structures and their relation <br />follows the recommendations and <br />and compatibility with other structures. <br />evidence provided in the HSA to <br />bring the majority of the existing <br />historic structure back to its 1952 <br />form, and the proposed plans <br />comply with those <br />recommendations. <br />Yes <br />Request 4 <br />The proposed change is compatible <br />with the existing structure in that it is <br />differentiated from the old. <br />Request 5 & 6 <br />Yes <br />The proposed changes are <br />compatible with the existing <br />structure in that it is differentiated <br />from the old. <br />3. The size of the structure, its <br />Yes <br />Request 4 <br />setbacks, its site, location, and the <br />The proposed addition represents a <br />appropriateness thereof, when compared <br />minimal increase in the size of the <br />to existing structures and the site. <br />existing structure. <br />12 <br />