Laserfiche WebLink
1,,tijsi I C'. <br />3 I I a I'1 a i <br />s s cs c:. i ,ri t c s <br />,r (" c h I t e c i 11 1" r <br />necessary to wider the overhL.ad access doors to 14' clear in order to effectively <br />accommodate newer apparatus. <br />4. Equipment used by modern Firefighters has evolved dramatically since the t970's. _'4s <br />such, storage requirements have increased, and servicing and repair facilities are new <br />uses to be integrated into a new facility. Firestation 1 does not contain adequate space <br />to store the apparatus and equipment, or to clean, maintain, and service that equipment, <br />5. i14od.ern ttrestations normally contain a residential component for continuous staffing to <br />provide better service and to reduce response times. Firestation 1 includes no <br />residential facilities, although it is equipped with a commercial kitchen. Additionally, <br />when contemplating the needs ❑f a residential facility, one roust consider the ancillary <br />u_5e.; that are to be included_ These Irsee, which ,itppnrr the firefighters, include laundry - <br />facilities, day -use facilities, recreation, fitness, and bathing roorns, study space, and <br />others_ Firestation No.1 includes none of these spaces. <br />6. The role of the firefighter has evolved over ume. Modern firefighters need to be well <br />acquainted with contemporary firefighting equipment and techniques. They need tcs be <br />in top physical condition in order to safely execute the lifesaving and firefighting role <br />that they fulfill. \s such, flexible use space is extraordinarily crucial to the training and <br />development of a firefighter's sophisticated skill set_ Firestation No. l does not contain <br />the appropriate space or sophisticated communication and utility infrastructure required <br />to aid in effective Firefighter training and development. <br />Construction techniques employed in the ccrostructiun of Station 1 its 1971, although <br />acceptable at Mat time, were less effective than current code -approved criteria. As such, <br />Station 1 is undcrdcsigned to meet current code performance criteria having tr..s do with <br />environmental factors, such as wind and seismic forces, and standard gravity loads. The <br />construction of the structure is comprised , Ft load hearing concrete -masonry walls with <br />little internal reinforcement, and concrete '`Ice" roof and floor decks. The facility <br />should meet the requirements of rnodem construction codes for essential facilities, <br />but in its current configuration, it falls far short, <br />H. In 1971 \vhen the ftrestation was constructed, there were no energy codes in effect to <br />govern or guide good design practices for energy conservation and environmental <br />stewardship. The basic construction provides no insulation in the ertr►zor shell nf'the <br />building's walls, and very limited insulation in the root, resulting is wide temperature <br />swings and the potential for extraordinary energy consumption were the facility to be <br />converted to contain residential use. 'f he \\'►nd()\VS are poor energy performers, as r►rr <br />dic residential-styk extctior doors. The concrete slab is tin -insulated. Mechanical <br />equipment for heating; and cooling the space performs poorly from an efficiency <br />standpoint. Water using textures are not water -conserving in design. Lighting is poor <br />and inefficient. We've always practiced the strategy that if you nuke warm air or cold <br />air — treat a building's envelope details so that you can keep the conditioned air, not Iusc <br />it. Firestation No.1 needs a deep energy retrofit. New interior finishes need to embody <br />current quality standards for resource conserwatton, enhanced safem and improved <br />indoor air quality. <br />