My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1977 02 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1977 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1977 02 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:11 PM
Creation date
8/24/2009 12:35:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/15/1977
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1977 02 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />February 15, 1977 <br />Minutes - page 2 <br /> <br />CONTINENTAL VIEW <br />ESTATES CONTINUED <br /> <br />The area will be developed to conform with the <br />subdivision regulations of Boulder County. The <br />size of the development is approximately 37! <br />acres, 57 planned sites, approximately <br />19,000 sq. feet each. <br />Mr. Cassidy stated that the project will have <br />city water and sewer services. <br />He stated that there is one problem with the <br />streets; which is the property which is owned <br />by B.S.C.S. corporation; it is far enough <br />out east to include the right-of-way as it has <br />been platted, and comes to Continental View <br />Estates side at the north end of Asure Way. <br />He stated that approximately 30 feet more is <br />needed to complete the right-of-way, so what <br />has been done is that the area has been de- <br />dicated for future development. <br /> <br />Planner Drumm stated that the Planning Com- <br />mission mentioned several items. <br />1. The County development standard is that <br />water and sewer lines go on private property, <br />where under the City regulation the lines are <br />put in the right-of-way. There are also some <br />questions on the extension, because the City <br />does not allow any dedications or <br />construction of half streets. This would have <br />to be resolved. <br />Mr. Drumm pointed out open space and city owned <br />property on the map. <br />On drainage, Mr. Drumm stated that Lord & <br />Assoc., have not completed their report; <br />however, the city is concerned about the <br />drainage and also there is awkward lotting that <br />may be used for detention ponds that would <br />fit into the drainage plans. <br />Mr. Drumm stated that the street standards <br />shown on the plan is rural type standards <br />that have paved way, rock shoulder and ditches <br />running along side. Mr. Drumm stated that <br />these standards do not correspond with the <br />present city street standards; however, <br />Planning Commission has reviewed some alter- <br />natives on this. He stated that since the <br />area will be developed in the County the <br />streets will be under county regulations. <br />Mr. Drumm stated that there has been dis- <br />cussion with the County regarding Open Space. <br />He stated that the City would like to take <br />the land under dedication and using the cash <br />in lieu of, for the remaining percentage to <br />build a path through that area. <br />Mr. Cassidy stated that the program is still <br />under review with the County. There was <br />no further discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.