Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLORADO TECH. CENTER <br />VERBATUM TESTIMONY <br /> <br />*NOTE <br /> <br />Mr. Mayor, we distributed copies of a <br />memorandum outlining our position that we <br />would like to review, but I will just <br />quickly bring you up to date on the <br />Pueblo meeting. <br />We went to Pueblo to appear before the <br />Colo. Land Use Commission. They heard <br />the testimony from the City Staff as well <br />as Mr. Mizel, Mr. Houlehan and Dr. Robin- <br />son. <br />The LUC considered <br />dations from their <br />Geological Survey. <br />they requested that <br />happen. <br />They requested that the 150 acres that <br />Dr. Robinson designated as a category of <br />geologie hazard, that he considered to be <br />a 1% chance that any subsidence would <br />occur, they requested that that be in- <br />cluded in the designation. <br />They also asked that some wording be amended <br />that dealt with certification by people as <br />relates to the hazards and how they <br />were to be corrected. The meeting lasted <br />from 1:30 P.M. to about 5:45 P.M. <br />There were some recommendations presented <br />that were modified by the LUC. They dealt <br />primarily with one thing, that was the <br />CGS people requested that 30% angle be <br />added to the hazard area which estimates <br />that the meeting varied, but I think would <br />have added double the amount of the land <br />that they had requested. They did modify <br />the Resolution, so as to strike that <br />portion and did approve the other three <br />areas that had been under discussion. <br />The memorandum that we distributed to you <br />is the staff recommendation on the proposed <br />Council response to the LUC Resolution dated <br />July 23, 1976. <br /> <br />Mr. Wurl read the Memorandum dated August <br />9, 1976. (SEE ATTACHED) <br /> <br />at that time recommen- <br />staff and the Colo. <br />To sum that up, basically, <br />two different things <br /> <br />MR. WURL <br /> <br />I might just suggest that if you reviewed <br />those things, and I'm sure you did, the <br />comments that Dr. Rogers had as to the <br />tests made by Dr. Robinson, he may want <br />to respond to that. <br /> <br />4. <br />