My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1976 08 10
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1976 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1976 08 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:10 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 11:34:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/10/1976
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1976 08 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RTD CONT'D <br /> <br />CONTINENTAL VIEW ESTATES <br />BILL SUITTS <br /> <br />Minutes - page 3 <br />August 10, 1976 <br /> <br />Mr. Adams stated that as in any business <br />you have someone take over for you when <br />you are ill or whatever. <br />Councilman DiCarlo asked who would be <br />responsible if the system was transporting <br />employees to work and the vehicle broke <br />down. <br />Mr. Hershey stated that the system is liable <br />in case of accident, but that would not <br />be covered on employees loss of time. <br />Percy Conarroe stated that he felt RTD <br />should supply some type of depot for the <br />people who are waiting to catch a ride. <br />Mr. Conarroe stated that as a citizen and <br />taxpayer, he would not be happy with any <br />type of RTD system different than what is <br />going on in the other communities. <br />Mr. Adams stated that he would check on <br />the possibility of a depot. <br />He also stated that he did not feel a <br />fixed route would be of any benefit to <br />Louisville and that the paratransit system <br />would be better for the start. <br />After discussion Mr. Adams stated that <br />he would check on the matters in question <br />and get back to Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Suitts stated to Council that the reason <br />he did not have his development underway <br />was because of a 400 foot land dedication <br />for the continuation of McCaslin Blvd. which <br />the County could not decide upon. After <br />meeting with the County and City staff, <br />Mr. Suitts stated that the County finally <br />decided to withdraw the proposed dedication; <br />therefore, Mr. Suitts has just received <br />the okay to continue. He requested that <br />Council approve a one year extension on <br />their agreement to provide water and sewer <br />service to his development with the stipu- <br />lation that when it is possible the area <br />will be annexed to the City. <br />Mr. Wurl stated that it was the staff and <br />planning commissions recommendation that <br />the extension be approved. <br />Councilman DiCarlo moved that the City grant <br />Mr. Suitts a one year extension on the com- <br />mittment that Council previously gave him <br />on utility service. Seconded by Councilman <br />Domenico. Motion carried. <br /> <br />3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.