My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1976 08 10
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1976 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1976 08 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:10 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 11:34:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/10/1976
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1976 08 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLO. TECH. CENTER <br />CONT'D <br /> <br />DR. ROBINSON <br /> <br />there would not be a significant damage <br />of properties in results of subsidence <br />and this was on our original study of the <br />Sproul homes. Now since that time we have <br />done studies in Lafayette, in and around <br />the city of Lafayette, and all of our work <br />has come to the same conclusion, that if <br />you have mines that are over 250 feet in <br />depth you are not going to have damage to <br />structures that our built on the surface <br />of the ground or failure. We know what <br />happens, we have a good basis of 18 holes <br />of what the conditions are underground and <br />why you are not going to have subsidence. <br />This is because we have drilled holes, <br />we have logged the core and we have reached <br />these conclusions. Unfortunately, the <br />CGS is not in a position to have made these <br />type of investigations. All of the in- <br />formation they have and data they have is <br />a result of somebody elses work. They <br />themselves do not go out and make an in- <br />vestigation. They only review the investi- <br />gations that other made. They do not <br />have on their staff an engineer, particularly <br />one in mining engineering familiar with <br />rock mechanics, they do not have a geo- <br />logist who has ever logged a single foot <br />of core related to mine subsidence, so <br />they have to base their conclusion, and <br />I have sympathy for them, only on what they <br />have read in the literature, what they have <br />been told in conferences by the Bureau of <br />Mines. They do not have any actual ex- <br />perience in working in this field and <br />having to arrive at a decision. <br />There decision, I mean you are never wrong <br />if you say no, I don't know if you have <br />ever been in the oil or mining business, <br />but you know some of the most successful <br />mining engineers are the ones who never <br />drove the drift or never built the mind <br />because they have never been wrong and they <br />didn't drive in there, spend $100,000 of <br />someones money and not find the ore, or <br />drill a dry hole in an oil well. So, if <br />you say no you are always right. You might <br />be wrong if you take a position and say <br />yes, I think that this will work, so I feel <br />that in that responsibility as a state <br />agency, there responsibility to the people <br />in the state, they have to say no in many <br />cases where they have not confidence, where <br /> <br />6. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.