Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLO. TECH. CENTER <br />CONT'D <br /> <br />DR. ROBINSON <br /> <br />there would not be a significant damage <br />of properties in results of subsidence <br />and this was on our original study of the <br />Sproul homes. Now since that time we have <br />done studies in Lafayette, in and around <br />the city of Lafayette, and all of our work <br />has come to the same conclusion, that if <br />you have mines that are over 250 feet in <br />depth you are not going to have damage to <br />structures that our built on the surface <br />of the ground or failure. We know what <br />happens, we have a good basis of 18 holes <br />of what the conditions are underground and <br />why you are not going to have subsidence. <br />This is because we have drilled holes, <br />we have logged the core and we have reached <br />these conclusions. Unfortunately, the <br />CGS is not in a position to have made these <br />type of investigations. All of the in- <br />formation they have and data they have is <br />a result of somebody elses work. They <br />themselves do not go out and make an in- <br />vestigation. They only review the investi- <br />gations that other made. They do not <br />have on their staff an engineer, particularly <br />one in mining engineering familiar with <br />rock mechanics, they do not have a geo- <br />logist who has ever logged a single foot <br />of core related to mine subsidence, so <br />they have to base their conclusion, and <br />I have sympathy for them, only on what they <br />have read in the literature, what they have <br />been told in conferences by the Bureau of <br />Mines. They do not have any actual ex- <br />perience in working in this field and <br />having to arrive at a decision. <br />There decision, I mean you are never wrong <br />if you say no, I don't know if you have <br />ever been in the oil or mining business, <br />but you know some of the most successful <br />mining engineers are the ones who never <br />drove the drift or never built the mind <br />because they have never been wrong and they <br />didn't drive in there, spend $100,000 of <br />someones money and not find the ore, or <br />drill a dry hole in an oil well. So, if <br />you say no you are always right. You might <br />be wrong if you take a position and say <br />yes, I think that this will work, so I feel <br />that in that responsibility as a state <br />agency, there responsibility to the people <br />in the state, they have to say no in many <br />cases where they have not confidence, where <br /> <br />6. <br />