City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 09 02

Home Browse Search

Howard was not in favor of increasing the size of the flag poles. He could live without condition No. 3, minimum 3' setback: He agreed with Keany's suggestion for crosswalk improvements. He felt conditions No. 2, 6, 7, and 8 should remain unchanged and No. 4 be changed to increased shrubbery. Davidson was in favor of allowing the up- lighting of the flagpoles. Tami Tanoue, City Attorney, pointed out that on the fourth "WHEREAS" a few words were missing. She asked that at the end of the second line the words, "should be approved, with the following conditions:" be added. Davidson moved that Council approve Resolution No. 33, Series 1997, with the words the City Attorney just added, deleting condition No. 1, changing condition No. 2 to .delete the words from and that there is no. up- lighting of the flags; deleting conditions No. 3, 4, and 5, leaving conditions No. 6, 7, and 8 in, adding the condition that the sign be approved by staff, and adding the condition that the access from Rite -Aid to Eagle be a full four -way stripe, seconded by Levihn. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 5 0 vote with Sisk and Lathrop being excused. RESOLUTION NO. 34, SERIES 1997 APPROVAL OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL" AGREEMENT LOUISVILLE /SUPERIOR Bill Simmons, City Administrator, stated that for several weeks the Mayor, Mayor Pro -tem, along with other elected officials from Superior had been negotiating an Intergovernmental Agreement to try to resolve language issues between Louisville and Superior. He reviewed the highlights of the agreement (SEE ATTACHED). The Superior Board of Trustees had reviewed this and their only comment related to paragraph No. 13 relating to transportation issues. He had the suggested changes available for Council's review. Davidson called for Council comments. Mayer felt the transportation issues were not clear as far as commitment. He asked what Louisville's commitment was. Davidson stated that the total commitment is the sales tax generated off Biella/Menkick. Simmons wanted to look at the agreement to make sure there is no obligation to appropriate beyond what sales taxes are generated. Davidson pointed out that Louisville had never said that the land exchange and sales tax sharing was also an interchange agreement. Louisville agreed to one section of an interchange agreement where Louisville would pledge its 2.7% it is going to collect towards their portion of the interchange. Davidson stated that either Superior goes forward with this or Louisville will go back to Plan A. 11