My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1975 09 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1975 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1975 09 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:35 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 9:46:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
9/16/1975
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1975 09 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'.4,:4! ` • ..5i1-�T ~ { lr� , N�' l ..I.; r �Z A• :fir. •• 7 •Y. . - � ir �q �� ��• 4 ca ' : •.� v • <br /> 4.'� ..1 `. ..- ,yr • latlQaa hie' .POW 4fir.!... 4 . <br /> • Hi Mist thee artick. ,,ts is aa>ier c t/id,y, <br /> that affects all arms sit state isterest to • <br /> general and geologic hazard ems speclfia1Ij.: :, <br /> Drumm Mr. reed article 113W the zoning .. <br /> ordinance (See attached Aetolutiom $7 3 • <br /> article 013 of zoning ordisathce) . <br /> • M►. Hobbs stated that in victim 13 4em2 E. f, <br /> • the City is grandfather; g the existing zoning <br /> on some of the land. He stated that if this • <br /> clause is kept in and if the City authorizes . -. <br /> the commercial zoning of an area and tree • <br /> finds it a flood hazard the City eight find <br /> a situation where a building permit will <br /> have to be approved for that area. Me stated <br /> that the City does not have to grandfather <br /> existing zonings. No suggested that this <br /> portion of the article be reviewed. <br /> Mr. Purl stated that is regards to the grand <br /> father clause; he did not know of an.y area <br /> that would be effected in the wanner stated <br /> by Mr. Hobbs. Mr. Merl stated the everything <br /> in the Cfty now has been zoned for a sub- <br /> stantial amount of time as it is and he could <br /> not forsee any problem. <br /> Mr. Hobbs also stated that vender section 13-103 <br /> A ininfstretfon - k 1. <br /> Where It allows the party involved to shots that <br /> it is not a hazard area; he would like to have <br /> the City to provide notice to the COS and LOC <br /> when contemplating a development. He stated <br /> that he would like to have the state agengr <br /> be consulted on the chatter. <br /> Mr. Shelton stated that in Section 13-105 . , <br /> Deeighhated Geologic Hazard Area D 3 where it <br /> . states 'Such temps shall also show the tom • . <br /> grepbs with a contour interval of 10 feet or <br /> smhe,ller.' N. suggested that 10 feet is roily <br /> toe large to determine whet shape the ground ' . .', <br /> • is and the development effects. Has suggested <br /> that S foot at the sexton would be substantial <br /> for the City. . <br /> Mr. Drumm stated that on the topograplyr, ft <br /> could be charged to reed 2 feet as in the <br /> rest of the zoning ordinance. <br /> Mr. Shelton also stated that on the time of <br /> reviewing developments; that a statement be <br /> put in giving the state an amount of time to <br /> consider the recommendations and give comments. <br /> • <br /> 7. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.