My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1978 02 09
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1978 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1978 02 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:38 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:29:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
2/9/1978
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1978 02 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
411 101,14Z' ` i.,i t,is <br /> Minutes - page 4 <br /> CONTINENTAL VIEW ESTATES <br /> CONTINUED City Planner Drum stated that the impact <br /> statement had been sent to various agencies <br /> for their response. He stated that some <br /> questions which were raised have been <br /> taken cars of also the report from the <br /> school planners states that the area in <br /> question is not in the Louisville service <br /> area, and the students would go to different <br /> schools, then in Louisville. Mr. Drum <br /> stated that he also had a letter from <br /> B.S.C.S. requesting that a fence be erected <br /> between the two properties. <br /> Councilman DelPizzo stated that the City <br /> is working within its comprehensive plan <br /> and the growth has been controlled growth <br /> which is helping the City to get in <br /> some larger stores which will be a bene- <br /> fit the the comunity. Also, he stated <br /> that even if the City does not growth <br /> when the need to transport students from <br /> different areas is needed our school may <br /> very well be overcrowded. <br /> Councilmen Caranci asked about the water <br /> I- situation. Mr. Drumm stated that the <br /> area in question does not have any historical <br /> water and the annexor was willing to supply <br /> the either water or money proportional to <br /> what was received in Hillsborough West. <br /> Mr. Jack Haines, representing the applicant <br /> stated that they are willing to negotiate <br /> and will provide the city with water, cash <br /> or a combination of both if some water is <br /> available. <br /> Mr. Wurl stated that what was concluded to <br /> be an appropriate amount of water as com- <br /> pared to the Hillsborough West annexation, <br /> was 22 shares of Davidson Water . <br /> Councilman Caranci asked about the plans <br /> for drainage as it states that the drain- <br /> age goes northeast; if this is true what <br /> will happen with the pollution of the re- <br /> servoir. Councilmen Xilker concurred, he <br /> wanted to know how the problem is planned <br /> to be solved. <br /> Mac. Drumm stated that the engineers have <br /> looked into the problem and feel that it <br /> can be corrected; however, no Teals plans <br /> as to how have been decided upon as the <br /> applicant is not required to solve the <br /> problem, but should be aware as to the <br /> possibility of correction. <br /> Councilman DiCarlo asked what would happen <br /> if the City does not like the method of <br /> solving the problem. Mr. Drumm stated that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.