My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1978 03 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1978 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1978 03 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:38 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:30:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
3/7/1978
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1978 03 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4111 gp Minutes - page 2 <br /> BOULDER COMP PAN Re stated that the county has been looking <br /> CONTINUED for ways to discourage development in the <br /> county with wells and septic tasks, with- <br /> in city services areas, until the time <br /> wb n the land can be annexed. <br /> Mr. Brouilette stated that one of the big <br /> issues the County has to deal with is <br /> What is non urban development, and how <br /> does the county adjust the toning. <br /> Mr. Brouilette discussed the county.' <br /> views on the rural zoning of 35 acres per <br /> dwelling. <br /> Mr. Wurl stated that he would like to <br /> have Councils approval for the City staff <br /> to attend the meeting of February 22, to <br /> voice the City's objections, which were <br /> noted in the February 21, 1978 memo .to <br /> Council and the August 18, 1976 memo. <br /> Councilman DiCarlo moved that the City <br /> staff and the City Long Range Planning <br /> Commission representative attend the <br /> February 22, meeting neither in support <br /> of or against the Boulder County Comp. <br /> Plan, but to express the exceptions that <br /> are reflected on page 3 of the February <br /> 21 1978 memo. Seconded by Councilman <br /> Kicker. <br /> Councilman Ditorenzo stated that she would <br /> note be able to attend the day session of <br /> the meeting and Planner Drumm would be <br /> in attendance at that time. <br /> After comments the motion carried. <br /> DUNN KRAHL - BOND ISSUE Mr. Dunn Krahl, Boettcher & Co. , presented <br /> to Council the proposed schedule for the <br /> Water Utility Bond issue. This would be <br /> for the Federal Grant/Loan pay back. <br /> Councilman Caranci stated that he was con- <br /> cerned about repayment because when growth <br /> stops, there will be no more tap fees and <br /> the repayment plans are including $230 <br /> from each water tap fee. <br /> Councilman Det 'izzo stated that he does <br /> not plan on paying more for his water so <br /> the city can row. <br /> Councilman Meer pointed out that at the <br /> last meeting when he made the motion to <br /> install the meters, he noted that by doing <br /> this, it will be locking the City into <br /> growth as in the comp plan . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.