Laserfiche WebLink
,•ti; , . • A► w% aJ., J7/P <br /> 410 ill Minutes page 3 <br /> AUDIENCE COMMENTS <br /> REPORT NY HOWARD BERRY Mr. Howard Berry gave a report on the Colo- <br /> COLORADO WATER CONFERENCE redo Water Conference stating that a <br /> Resolution was passed supporting the <br /> Foothills Water Project, in principle only; <br /> that being that Federal Agencies should <br /> not become involved in matters which are <br /> in most part strictly local. <br /> Be gave a brief summary of other matters <br /> that were discussed. <br /> CITY ATTORNEY REPORT <br /> ORDINANCE #600 Attorney Joss read Ordinance #600 on se- <br /> FOSTER ET AL ANNEXATION cond reading by title only. Mayor Waschak <br /> SECONDREADING . opened the public hearing. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING Attorney Joss reported that the ordinance <br /> and notice of public hearing mere pro- <br /> perly published in the local paper. <br /> There were no comments from the audience <br /> for or against the application. <br /> Staff reported that the area is within <br /> the comprehensive plan and does have the <br /> 1/6 contiguity required for annexation. <br /> Also the area is being zoned agricultural.. <br /> There were no other comments public hearing <br /> was closed and Councilman Kilker moved <br /> that Ordinance #600 be adopted. Se- <br /> conded by Councilman Caranci. Roll call <br /> Caranci yes, DiCarlo yes, DelPizzo yes, <br /> M»ier yes, Kilker yes. Motion carried. <br /> ORDINANCE #601 Attorney Joss read Ordinance #601 on se- <br /> FOSTER ET AL ANNEXATION cond reading by title only. Mayor Waschak <br /> SECOND READING opened the public hearing. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING Attorney JOss reported that the ordinance <br /> and notice of public hearing were pro- <br /> perty published in the local paper. <br /> There were no comments from the audience <br /> for or against the application. <br /> Staff reported that the area is within the <br /> comprehensive plan and does have the 1/6 <br /> contiguity required for annexation. <br /> Attorney Joss stated that the one strip of <br /> land within this annexation which was owned <br /> by Mr. Tull is still included. He stated <br /> that he received word from Mr. Erhart, Mr. <br /> Tull's Attorney, that Mr. Tull wished to go <br /> on record that they were neither for nor <br /> against the application and were not included <br /> as one of the petitioning parties. <br />