My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1981 04 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1981 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1981 04 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:48 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 11:26:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
4/21/1981
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1981 04 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
410 411 <br /> 4/7/81 Page -4- <br /> 2. Parking ratio for no fixed seating in <br /> a building will be 21 sq. ft. for one park- <br /> ing space. <br /> 3. Parking spaces located off the site must <br /> be in the same zone or a zoning district <br /> which is less restrictive. <br /> 4. Parking spaces should not be used to <br /> park vehicles for advertising. <br /> 5. Yard and bulk requirements for new office <br /> zone. <br /> 6. Relative to minor changes in the PUD <br /> plan may be granted administrative approval <br /> of the Director of Community Development <br /> without the necessity of a hearing before <br /> Planning Commission or City Council. <br /> Councilman Meier Requested more specific wording be incorpor- <br /> ated in this section, rather than just minor <br /> changes. <br /> Director Rupp stated because there are so <br /> many things that are minor, i.e. fence lo- <br /> cation, shifting landscaping material, etc. <br /> He advised if a list of these were what <br /> council wished, he would be happy to pro- <br /> vide one. <br /> Councilman Meier suggested that he would <br /> desire such a list, since Council had passed <br /> the original PUD and would be more knowledge- <br /> able of the amendments. This would not have <br /> to be incorporated in the ordinance, but could <br /> be discussed at a study session. <br /> Director Rupp inquired if this could be done <br /> without including the list in the code. <br /> Attorney Joss suggested an administrative <br /> list would be helpful as a reference for his <br /> office and council. <br /> Councilman Carnival Concurred with Councilman Meier's suggestion <br /> regarding the list as it was a sensitive area <br /> with Planning Commission and Council is con- <br /> cerned and he was confident that Director Rupp <br /> would use caution. <br /> Director Rupp informed Council that the list <br /> would be compiled and presented to Council <br /> for approval. <br /> 7. Conformance in 3 years for all non-con- <br /> forming signs in the City - specifically by <br /> April 1 , 1964. <br /> Councilman Fauson Inquired how people would be informed of the <br /> time limit for compliance of signs. <br /> Director Rupp advised that if the amendments <br /> were approved by Council, every sign owner <br /> or business estsblishement that is not in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.