Laserfiche WebLink
NOW <br /> 5/18/82 Page -13- <br /> his understanding that 2/3rds of this <br /> goal had been reached. <br /> Tony DelPizzo Protested the scale of gallonage over the <br /> minimum of 10.000 - stating he felt this <br /> increase was equivalent to larger cities. <br /> Administrator Wurl Advised the first proposal submItted to <br /> the former Council the increase was $12.00 <br /> per month and this was discussed at a <br /> budget study session on how this could <br /> be accomplished. He further advised this <br /> proposal was not to show a profit for the <br /> City; but only to match revenues with ex- <br /> penditures. <br /> Mr. Henry Yekel Stated he would like bottom line figures. <br /> including all income from tap fees for <br /> water and sewer. He noted the bond issue <br /> on the agenda and commented this indebted- <br /> ness is to retire capital improvements to <br /> both systems - again requested all income <br /> and all expenditures total deparmenta. <br /> Tom Akins Commented he did not doubt the increase <br /> 283 Matchless St. was justified and did appreciate receiving <br /> the flier; however felt there was information <br /> lacking_ He commented he noted his water <br /> bill was computer printed therefore the <br /> City must have a record of everyone's usage. <br /> It was his opinion a buy and sell study could <br /> be taken and this rate increase should be <br /> applied to it for projected income.and <br /> expenditures. Both these types of informa- <br /> tion do not appear on the flier. He felt <br /> any new rate schedule should be applied <br /> against any new data base the City has in <br /> the computer and project what the income <br /> will be. <br /> Council Comments Commented to try to answer some of the <br /> Councilman Cummings concerns regarding Mr. Woodbury's inquiry <br /> of why we are paying for a plant that was <br /> built in 1934 is possibly the total answer <br /> to the increase. This problem has not been <br /> addressed - it was his feeling it would be <br /> foolish to think the old rates would suffice. <br /> Previously. when the increase was proposed to <br /> former councilmembers it was known this <br /> type input would be had - it was ignored. <br /> Finally if Council does not do something <br /> the service will dry up. so do we make the <br /> decision now or let our children do it. <br /> . {� <br />