My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 11 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 11 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 12:08:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/3/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 11 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• 110 411 <br /> 10/19/82 Page -14- <br /> Councilman Fauson Inquired what criteria is used in the review <br /> of the non-conforming use. <br /> Rautenstraus advised i. e. , percentages of <br /> business, percentages of traffic, whether <br /> the entertainment is there for long periods <br /> of time without the establishment being operated <br /> as a restaurant , etc . <br /> Councilman Leary Suggested that one of the councilmembers in <br /> that Ward go to the establishment several <br /> nights a week to view the situation. <br /> ACCEPTANCE OF THE CITY Councilman Fauson moved, Councilwoman Morris <br /> ATTORNEY'S REPORT seconded that the City Attorney' s report be <br /> accepted and placed on file. Question called <br /> for. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Mayor and councilmembers had a copy of a memo <br /> FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEMS from the City Engineer addressing this item. <br /> MAP UPDATE APPROVAL <br /> Councilman Ferrera Inquired of Engineer Blanchard what the re- <br /> visions of the map were . Blanchard advised <br /> the primary one was the street classification, <br /> i.e . Lafayette has 287 thru their City, while <br /> Louisville has only a small portion of 42 <br /> which did not balance out percentage wise on <br /> classification. It does not effect the City <br /> on funding, but does effect the level they <br /> wanted for a collector or arterial street. <br /> Also there were a few systems where the Federal <br /> people felt the City had duplicated that they <br /> didn' t feel were necessary. <br /> Councilman Ferrera Noted on the map that Bella Vista Drive stopped <br /> at 96th St . rather than going to Hiway 42 , he <br /> inquired if the map was published would the <br /> City be frozen into that type of road? <br /> Blanchard replied - no. It was a boundary line <br /> rather than a street line. <br /> his <br /> Councilman Fauson Commented it was/impression the line was an <br /> easement that was dedicated to the City by <br /> the railroad and is not within the City limits. <br /> APPROVAL Councilman Ferrera moved, Councilman Cussen <br /> seconded that the Federal Aid Urban Systems <br /> Map revision be approved, Question called for. <br /> All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.