My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 11 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 11 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 12:08:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/16/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 11 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
11/3/82 Page -14- <br /> Dennis Knowlton Wished to express the frustrations that the <br /> 955 West Plum citizens have communicating with the Council. <br /> Felt they had one shot . He felt that there <br /> was one additional thing that had to do with <br /> the Declaratory Judgement. It was his under- <br /> standing that there was a case in court; now <br /> all the sudden there is another thing that <br /> has been brought up in Court. The thing <br /> had never been judged on the basic issue of <br /> making a Declaratory Judgement. It has cost <br /> some of the citizens on the Mesa a signifi- <br /> cant amount of money. He is not a member of <br /> the MCIC, but he was called to give a deposition <br /> which cost him $288.00 for attorney fees. <br /> He felt this was a lot of money for something <br /> he had a personal interest in, but did not <br /> volunteer to do that. Stated some very real <br /> things had come up in the subdivision out of <br /> 30 homes, 10 of them are for sale. He felt <br /> the Neodata proposal had some impact on the <br /> sale of the homes. One of the homes did not <br /> sell because of this issue. Three of the <br /> four homes that border on the Neodata proposal <br /> in his subdivision are for sale. Felt a per- <br /> sonal loss as the value of his property will <br /> decline. He stated if the City seeks a <br /> Declaratory Judgement , the MCIC will drop the <br /> suit. He spoke with Don Edmonds who appealed <br /> the issuing of the building permit. He also <br /> stated the appeal would be dropped if the <br /> City requests a Declaratory Judgement. He <br /> felt this would be the solution to the entire <br /> issue and would be a much less expensive way <br /> to resolve it. Strongly urged Council to <br /> seek the Declaratory Judgement. <br /> Councilman Leary Commented he still felt that Council would <br /> still be on different sides of the issue if <br /> we went into Court on the Declaratory Judgement. <br /> He was not certain in this case or future cases <br /> it is going to cost the City any more money <br /> to go this route. Still felt Council should <br /> wait for the other ruling. <br /> Motion to Expedite the Ruling Councilman Leary moved. Mayor Meier seconded <br /> that the Court be asked to expedite the ruling <br /> on the MCIC suit that is before them now. <br /> Councilman Cussen Commented he was willing to wait until next <br /> Council meeting so that the Clerk can be asked <br /> what the status of this is. He will at that <br /> time entertain a motion that the City seek a <br /> Declaratory Judgement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.