My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1987 12 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1987 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1987 12 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:58 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 3:07:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
12/15/1987
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1987 12 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n those main arterials is not only what we want as <br /> a City to give good visual aspects of our City, but <br /> also it enhances the development. In that sense, <br /> the development profits by it, making a more sale- <br /> able product for the development. Once it is in, <br /> sodded and sprinkled, that's a forever thing for the <br /> City to maintain...continuous mowing, watering, etc. <br /> I feel that the developer should do these on the <br /> main arterials. I realize that we are going to be <br /> discussing these fees at our next Work Session, but <br /> I think that the fees that we do derive, don't <br /> necessarily have to go back into that exact develop- <br /> ment....we use those fees elsewhere throughout the <br /> City that helps that development such as entry fea- <br /> tures, etc. so that when you come into our City we <br /> have these nice amenities. People then want to live <br /> here and will buy a house in that development. <br /> Therefore, those fees ahould not necessarily go back <br /> directly into that immediate area. I realize some <br /> of it should, but I don't think any large portion of <br /> it needs to go back in.' <br /> Mayor Pauson further stated that any development <br /> that comes into the City impacts us in a lot of <br /> ways. "Those fees that we get from these <br /> `fievslop=cnts help us to minimize these impacts. <br /> Those are my feelings on that subject." <br /> Szymanski agreed with Mayor Fauson's comments <br /> stating that that is how the City has done business <br /> in the past and doesn't see any reason to change it <br /> now. Szymanski would only agree to these four <br /> subdivisions under the provisions recommended by <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> Sackett stated that he would like to see any <br /> cobblestone eliminated and replace it with sod. <br /> Sackett also had concerns with homeowner's <br /> associations and their ability to maintain open <br /> area in the development. <br /> Both wanush and Hoyt stated that if properly formed, <br /> homeowner associations can and do work. <br /> Wanush stated that it becomes an issue of whether <br /> the City accepts as dedicated land anything that <br /> developers do not want to use. Staff is saying that <br /> if there are areas that that are not acceptable, <br /> then it is up to the developer to form a homeowners <br /> association that meets certain criteria to maintain <br /> those area <br /> Mohr stated that since the Council is going to be <br /> considering this same issue on another development <br /> in a Work Session later this week, would it be <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.