City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 06

Home Browse Search

Paul xartus, 639 Coal Crank Lane (sign -up card stated address as 936 Fairfield Lane), Louisville, CO, seconded Tzont2sak's concerns about saving the bike path. He was also concerned about if the developer stripped all three (3) phases, how the developer would control the dust on windy days. Lynne Avery, 741 K. ?Wherry Street, Louisville, CO, spoke of her concern about what asaurancs they have fray the developer that this new development will not proceed on an accelerated schedule. She was also concerned about the overcrowding of the schools. ad Kicoio, 766 N. Tir Court, Louisville, CO, wondered if, in times of revenue, the annexation is in the bast interest of the City of Louisville. He also had concerns about the overcrowding of the schools. Paul Darby, 102 Vista Lane, Louisville, CO, had concerns about the overcrowding of the schools and the growth of Louisville in general. Debra E. Whitehead, 361 S. Taft Court, Louisville, CO, asked Council to wait until the Comprehensive Plan was completed. Also, she was concerned about the school overcrowding. Don Iverson, 799 w. Dahlia Street, Louisville, CO, was concerned about the overcrowding of the schools and having open space, with as little growth as possible. Linda bolaer, 560 Kanorwood Lane, Louisville, CO, was concerned about the park being located at the end of the driving range. She felt that was dangerous. The overcrowding of the schools was also a concern of hers. Davidson called for anyone else who wished to speak on Resolution No. 32. NONt Davidson closed the Public Hearing. Davidson called for Council consents and questions. Mayers 1 am going to support this development. If we waited for the Coop Plan, south Louisville is one of last areas to be considered and probably wouldn't be consid ered for another three (3) years. As far as the schools, one of the novel things about this plan is this phasing of it at at reasonably moderate rate. This is a legally binding 4ocusent. They 5