Laserfiche WebLink
Griffiths: lased on the disclosures of the <br /> Mayor and Council this evening as to <br /> site visits, contacts, and the <br /> belief that they can decide this in <br /> an impartial fashion, do you have <br /> any objection to partiuipetion by <br /> the Mayo: or any of the Council <br /> somber' in the decision that will be <br /> made this evening? <br /> Sheffield: I just have s question about that. <br /> Are you saying that's because this <br /> is a quasi - hearing, or because it's <br /> • subdivision plat, rather than a <br /> PUD? <br /> Griffiths: It's a subdivision plat approval <br /> that's a quasi- judicial process and <br /> my question is do you object to the <br /> participation of any of the Council <br /> Sheffield, So, we don't. <br /> Griffiths, You began your comments by <br /> addressing the annexation agreement <br /> and certain rights that you beliove <br /> have been provided to your property. <br /> It's not your belief, is it, that <br /> the property is exempt from City <br /> subdivision regulations? <br /> Sheffield: :to. <br /> Griffiths: I understand that the plat that has <br /> been provided to the Council, it's <br /> been referred to as a proposed, <br /> revised plat. t would like to sake <br /> sure that we're all work:.ng off of <br /> the same plat document. i have one <br /> (1) plat that's stamped October 1. <br /> 1992. How would we find out what is <br /> exactly the revised proposed plat. <br /> so that we all talk from the same * <br /> document? <br /> Franklin: The plat that we submitted to the <br /> Planning Commission for its review <br /> is • two (1) page document that's <br /> bound with • blue binder. The <br /> proposed plat, which the developer <br /> offered to shut how he would agree <br /> 14 <br />