My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/20/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 10 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• t <br /> and implement the Planning <br /> Commission's recomnendittions <br /> regarding park end open 5, ace <br /> allotting, is a single sheet 92 <br /> paper. The third item is the cress <br /> sectional rketches, which are the <br /> oversized, very large documents. <br /> Griffiths: So, there is a single plat document. <br /> " I see from the Council members <br /> 'document, it boo written on it <br /> "Revised per P.C. conditions ". Is <br /> that the one that is the proposed, <br /> revised plat? <br /> Franklin: That is proposed. That is my <br /> handwriting. That is the applicants <br /> response to several of the Planning <br /> Commission's conditions. <br /> Griffith.; For clarification, if the Council <br /> were to act on a doizusent tonight, <br /> what document specifically would <br /> they be acting upon? <br /> Franklin; Trying to guess what the Council t <br /> would desire to have in terms of a <br /> final set of conditions, I think <br /> dictates what plat toy approve. <br /> They could apps :.ve the plat as <br /> submitted to Planning Commission, <br /> which is the two (2) page bound <br /> document. They could approve that <br /> plat with the Planning Commission <br /> conditions require that to be re- <br /> drawn and reviewed by staff for <br /> compliance prior to recording, or <br /> they could approve that single sheet <br /> copy w.th regard to specific <br /> Planning Commission conditions and <br /> approve the plat with the other <br /> Planning Commission conditions, <br /> requiring staff to review the final <br /> document prior to recording, or they <br /> could take action, request to see <br /> the final document as • follow up <br /> item in the following meeting. <br /> Griffiths; I wanted to make sure that all of <br /> tha Council members were reierrinq <br /> to the same have all three (3) <br /> of those documents and were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.