My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/20/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 10 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> ROUE 4+ <br /> Davidson went on to comments opposed to the subdivision. <br /> Debra palish, 477 Fireside, Lewisville, CO, had • request from her <br /> daughter to ask Council to please save sled hill. Debra: Relish was <br /> at the meeting representing the Sierra Club suer meeting with <br /> neighbors, the members of the East County Issues Subcommittee of <br /> the Sierra Club voted una::iax;,usly to support the neighborhood in <br /> trying to prevent the development of sled hill. That resolution <br /> was taken on to the Executive Coamittee of the Indian Peaks group <br /> of the Sierra Club, which also passed that resolution unanimously. <br /> She stated that the position that the Sierra Club has taken is that <br /> they oppose the development of this particular piece of property in <br /> Louievill• and would support looking for other possible means of <br /> purchasing or buying the land. She feels that sled hill Is an <br /> integral part of the community. She understands that there are <br /> black foxes that live on the property. <br /> Alexis Bristol, 1416 Fillmore Place, Louisville, CO addressed the <br /> issue of existing traffic on existing neighborhood streets. she <br /> felt that little thought had been given regarding the cut through <br /> traffic on West Willow and West Linden, which she felt could not be <br /> ignored. She stated that it would be very difficult to make a lett <br /> hand turn off of South Boulder Road from Ridgeviaw Estates, <br /> especially during rush hour traffic' during the winter months, when <br /> the streets are icy and slick. She stated that the access road <br /> that gets onto South Boulder Road crosses over open space, which <br /> ch <br /> set a very poor precedent to allow a developer to pave open space. <br /> Approximately 1,440 additional vehicle trips per day would impact <br /> the Hillsborough West Subdivision oast of Washington Street. She <br /> stated that it will worsen the already dangerous situation at the <br /> school crossing on Washington Street. She also addressed concerns <br /> about blocking existing homeowner's views. she stated that U <br /> existing homeowners, they would lose their rights to the air, <br /> light, and view, as stated in the Louisville toning principles. <br /> She wondered, if the new homes east of Fillamore Place would be <br /> allowed to erect fences. If so, bow far from the existing property <br /> lines wculd the fencing go, how high would they go, and would it be <br /> , a solid fence. She asked that the letter that the Mayor had <br /> mentionel be made a part of the official record. <br /> Davidson: Certainly. We'll make that part of <br /> the record. <br /> Franklin: The zoning regulations allow 6 ft. <br /> privacy fences in the rear and side <br /> yarde up to the front yard set <br /> backs. In short, the common <br /> boundary to the east side of <br /> Hillsborough West, the homeowners <br /> could apply, as could the old, for 6 <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.