Laserfiche WebLink
referring to all three (3) of those <br /> documents. <br /> avidsons i wonder if Council would object to <br /> us holding our questions until alter <br /> the public comments? <br /> Council agreed. <br /> Sheffield: Ny understanding in talking with our <br /> engineer, the two (2) bound copies <br /> are pages 1 0 2 of the plat and the <br /> single page is page 3 of the plat, <br /> which that part was revised by <br /> Planning Commission. so, it is a <br /> ooaplet. set. On. (2) and two (2) <br /> are as is, three (3) also is. Ill l <br /> three of those docwsents are part of <br /> the plot. <br /> Davidson asked for comments from interested parties in favor of the <br /> subdivision plat. <br /> Barbara Turner, 1495 Franklin Court, Louisville, CO, supports the <br /> subdivision. She is a neighbor and has always expected this tract <br /> to be develo,ed. she likes the open space, but sbe.fools that the <br /> developer has the right to develop it. She supports the conditions <br /> that the Planning Commission has put on this subdivision. She was <br /> concerned about the height that these houses oould be. The City of <br /> Louisville allow th, 35 ft- height restriction to be calculotoed <br /> from the street level plus 35 ft. she felt that it you haws a <br /> situatl.^m where the lot falls downhill from the street, you could <br /> possibly have a situation where the house is 60 ft. higher than the <br /> back of tho lot. In her situation, from her back property lino to <br /> the proposed street is 30 ft. so, the house eight be is ft. higher <br /> than how back property line. She would like for the :arty to have <br /> a more r.aliotlo interpretation of height allowance. She felt it <br /> would be more effective for the community to have the 35 ft. height <br /> limitation come from the existing ground, rather than the proposed <br /> road in front of the house. Other neigh that live close to the <br /> waft and to the south are not looking forward to suing 50 - 60 ft. <br /> houses blocking their view. She supports the idea of the park. <br /> She feels that the proposed access on to south Boulder Road is <br /> taking away the open space that was granted in this subdivision 12 <br /> years ago. she believes that a path uhould be placed along <br /> Davidson Ditch to connect the open space up to South Boulder Road. <br /> She felt it would be a benefit to the community to have an access <br /> froa this open space up to where ssest Willow Street for their <br /> children to gat from one pa4t of the town to another. <br /> Davidson called for anyone also in the audience who wished to speak <br /> in favor of the subdivision. <br /> 16 <br />