My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 11 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 11 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/20/2010 6:59:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/17/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 11 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> Aic+hardsons It's not right to the lot line. <br /> it's three incw a from, according to <br /> Us survey. The owne of the <br /> had t p�ropetty since expand s� and <br /> sh• t s telling se that I Lave another <br /> 1 1/2 ft., that the survey is off. <br /> Rather than having any controversy, <br /> 1 going with the survey. <br /> Kiyern haul, can this be a potential <br /> problem? <br /> Mood: The applicant is in compliance with <br /> the sot back requirements, which are <br /> exempt for the CBD area there. It <br /> could be a probl <br /> Maj w as concorned about the zero set backs, na <br /> where x4intonce <br /> vial be required. <br /> Howard moved that Council accept Resolution No. 63, series 1992, <br /> final PUD development plan for Century 91. seconded by Hornbostel. <br /> Moll call was taken. Notion passed by a 3-0 vote with Lathrop and <br /> Sisk being absent. <br /> DISCUSSION /DdCIgIOM COIfCZA,1 rJ Q MOWTION OF 1l. 2MM of ZAAMKU? <br /> Vii/ NAROMM AM JCmmm -8130 = PAOP1 -' M 12 EMCLiVf <br /> BDWIMSIGM <br /> Annette Brand, City Adminietrator, mounted that she had net with <br /> the Xayor, Councilpeoplo, and resident& from the Enclave on several. <br /> different occasions and discussed whether or not the easement <br /> should be opened or not, including matters of safety. <br /> Gail Peres, 1116 Nest tnclave, Louisville, 00, stated that this is <br /> not a personal issue, but a legal issue. She stated amt #any <br /> neabers of this neighborhood want access to the open space across <br /> the pedestrian "assent and by law have a right to that access. <br /> ?here are some who have expressed concerns about child safety, if <br /> there was access. She stated that it these concerns are gamins <br /> and sincere, why have none of the concerned individuals either <br /> acknowledgod or taken any initiative to rectify the existing <br /> condition of a gapinq bole in the present !once. she uses this <br /> access to enter the open apace on a regular basis. She felt a <br /> gated walkway across the easeaent will pose no additional threat to <br /> child safety. <br /> David Fahey, 1119 best Enclave Circle, Louisville, CO. was vary <br /> auch in support of this "ass ant,, although not at all costs. He <br /> fait that the decision to grant the fence permit to the Johnson- <br /> Sieprons and the Hard>~ans was unfortunate and a sistake. The <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.