Laserfiche WebLink
easesent was put in place before any residents worn able to voice <br /> t his op inion. Be stated that re sid a nts of the inalave were also <br /> support th claim oo the Ha 4a� WA J avohnson SS and o -w t ot� <br /> 1>Al�ans that the <br /> City bear the financial responsibility to undo this mistake. <br /> Curtis $*bar illd Weet ;nclave, Louisville, Co, eVlained that in <br /> 1964 council voted to approve the easement, feeling there Vas a <br /> need for direct %oceas, rbon it was approved. There is still a <br /> need for direct aacees. Sober stated that them is also a legal <br /> issuS that needs to be considered, vhioh is that this is a <br /> Pedestrian easeMQnt. The City inadvertently all oMed a forme to be <br /> pl4o44 over a City sa64"nt. MWn he moved into the Snalays, be <br /> understood there was a pedestrian easement and that it would be <br /> developed. It should be no s urprise that when you build a fe nce on <br /> Aft easesrant, that one day it night have to be moved. H& painted <br /> out that theta were two petitions in support of having aA access. <br /> Dena rra *igr, 1122 West Eaolave Circle, Louisville, CO, was <br /> concerned about safety, as there is a large drainage ditch in the <br /> open spans and other hosards such as snakes, prairie dog holes to <br /> trip in, or possible drowning. she was also concerned about the <br /> Cost to the City,, thinking the ]money could be better used in other <br /> are" . Frasier had a problem with ublic access over private <br /> property, which could pose *me liability concerns to the property <br /> owners. She felt Council needed to address the fact that there is <br /> access right around the corner from the enclave that the City ban <br /> just put In. <br /> Iuty k►ustin, 1121 West enclave Circle, Louisville, 00, agreed with <br /> Frazier on the safety issue. She stated that the ditck is a very <br /> 1on9 deep ditch, 4 - 10 ft. deep in ,wet laces with vary stoop <br /> walls that are not protected by any kind or concrete in toss of <br /> slipping or falling in. When the water don run, it runs several <br /> feet deep, which is why they consider it to be such a danger. She <br /> felt they couldn't second guess what the n ew residents of the <br /> Znclsve are going to desire. There are new residents, who support <br /> having *cceaa through the Ensla to the open space, but there are <br /> just as many who reel that part of the roasan why they bought their <br /> property was because there wan Wt access through the open space. <br /> She felt that this money would be better spent elsewhere. Austin <br /> felt that the easement was a "desire" rather than a "nee4 She <br /> urged Cauneil to vote to vaoate this easement. <br /> Mary Nunson, 1126 West tWlave Circle, Louisville, CO, opposed the <br /> easement d ue to the safety issue, among others. She didn O t feel it <br /> was in the beat interest or the majority of the population of <br /> Louisville. She would rather see more parks and playgrounds <br /> developed in the city. She would like to see the money bettor <br /> spent. <br /> arayson Hardsan, 1114 West Enclave Circle, Louisville, CO, spoke of <br /> 30 <br />