My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 02 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 02 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 11:18:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/19/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 02 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> ..,. <br /> basically the agreement sets out the <br /> regulations that will apply to the territory <br /> subject to the agreement. <br /> Howard: I would like this section as least clarified. <br /> Hornbostel: If anything was agreed upon and amended all <br /> eight parties had to sign off on the <br /> amendment. <br /> Griffiths: If there are other areas that need to be <br /> clarified, please let me know. <br /> Sackett: I do think it is a better route to go, Empire <br /> to 42 and talk to Lafayette about finalizing <br /> our open space in that area. If we get a <br /> chance to consider this, I would go for this. <br /> Carnival: The stance that Broomfield is taking is that <br /> they have the Special Improvement District or <br /> the 96th Street Interchange does not get <br /> built. <br /> Davidson: I would say that they are looking at whatever <br /> assistance they can get in hoping to fund the <br /> Interchange. It a matter of whether <br /> Louisville wants to form a Special <br /> Improvement District that would include newly <br /> annexed land. I think this kind of thing <br /> should go on as a separate agreement. <br /> Carnival: There would be nothing wrong with <br /> acknowledging that we would be willing to <br /> work with the SID through volunteer <br /> commitment from any of the property owners <br /> that feel they can benefit from the <br /> interchange. <br /> Hornbostel: We have not heard from STC to see if they <br /> really want this SID. We do not want to <br /> force people to belong to this. If there is <br /> too much stuff in the agreement, it sets the <br /> agreement up to fail. A lot of the issues <br /> that are being brought tonight are just being <br /> brought up at the Technical Committee meet- <br /> ings. <br /> Davidson: On page 4, Section 5 under the Annexation <br /> Provisions. We keep going to the meetings <br /> and we keep covering that Louisville and <br /> Broomfield are going to have an agreement, <br /> and Lafayette and Broomfield are going to <br /> have an agreement, but they keep writing it <br /> as if Louisville, Lafayette and Broomfield <br /> are going to have an agreement. Broomfield <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.