My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 04 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 04 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 11:38:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/2/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 04 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> __"0 <br />Davidson: One thing we have to ask ourselves is, if <br /> Lafayette insists on having that in there or they <br /> are not going to sign the agreement are we willing <br /> to scuttle the entire parkway? <br />Sackett: Absolutely. <br />Davidson: It is entirely a compromise and if one city pulls <br /> out, the whole thing goes down the tubes. I don't <br /> know that they would take that position, I don't <br /> know that at all. <br />Brand: We need to get a resolution on that, when they go <br /> back to the next meeting they will be asked to say <br /> yes, put it in the Parkway Plan, or no, don't put <br /> it in the Parkway Plan. <br />Hornbostel: I move that, that piece of property be included in <br /> the Parkway Plan. <br />Gr iff i ths : Are you referring to the purple stripped area <br /> north of the Parkway. <br />Hornbostel: Lastoka property is not included. <br />Fauson: I think we need to describe the property to some <br /> extent. <br />Hornbostel: The southeastern most portion of the purple <br /> stripped area. <br />Howard: I would second that if you added that we get a <br /> legal description of that one little section and I <br /> second. <br />Hornbostel moved and Howard seconded, requested that it also include a <br />legal description of the property in question. <br />Roll call was taken on the motion. Motion was defeated 3-4 with <br />Fauson, Szymanski, Carnival and Sackett voting no. <br />Howard: What we did was defeat the motion to have that <br /> added in. According to the City Administrator we <br /> have to tell these people something. We can't <br /> just say well we're not just going to have it. <br /> What we didn't do is say we are going to do some- <br /> thing. We said we weren't going to do something, <br /> but we didn't vote on not doing something. We <br /> just said the action is still pending. We have <br /> not as of yet saiq that we are going to send to <br /> this committee anything that says what the posi- <br /> tion of Council is. <br />.Fauson: I don't think we need to state what our position <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.