My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 08 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 08 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 1:47:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/20/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 08 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> --,. <br /> load. On the down side if we do see a decrease in permits over <br /> the next few years we are also prepared to modify staff <br /> ~equirements at that time. Either way, we would have to <br /> simply look at additional man hours in terms of additional <br /> people to handle the work load. That is offset as it has been <br /> by allocation of some or all of the permit fees that we have <br /> received from that additional workload. <br />Davidson: My concern there, is not just your department, it is the entire <br /> City. We are buying snow plows as fast as we can afford them. <br /> Weare barely staying even. Weare hiring police officers as <br /> fast as we can afford to hire them and buying patrol cars as <br /> fast as we can afford to buy them. We still don't seem to have <br /> enough to patrol in front of the schools when they open, to a <br /> level that we would like to. I am really concerned about <br /> adding to this level of work that is on the City right now. Mr. <br /> Markel, you have heard a lot of the citizens concerns here <br /> tonight and I am sure there are a lot of other citizen concerns <br /> out there of people who live in the neighborhood and people <br /> who just drive by and like the view. What as a developer would <br /> you do to mitigate those? <br />Markel: To mitigate the impact of the subdivision on the people that <br /> are enjoying the area, is that the question? I would like to <br /> clarify that I think a lot of people are getting wrapped up into <br /> this particular study concept. This was just a feasibility plan to <br /> see if you did 12,000 square foot lots how that would work. I <br /> think that working on the plan to develop an open space, if <br /> that was a desire of the Planning Commission or the <br /> neighborhood groups, we have some density open to that. <br /> There is a computer program that is available to take a picture <br /> of that area and superimpose houses in that particular view to <br /> scale, to see exactly the impact of that kind of housing <br /> development. Some of the mitigating measures would be one <br /> reducing and limiting the heights of the residences. I have not <br /> presented any open space in this particular plan but I am <br /> willing to work with the people of the community. I am not <br /> invested in this particular plan; I did not think I was coming <br /> here tonight to defend a particular plan, I thought that would <br /> be down the line. What I hope we are not doing tonight is <br /> disapproving or approving a site plan. I would like to be able <br /> to demonstrate that I could make something work and have a <br /> win/win situation for the developer and the citizens. Since I <br /> don't know all the issues it is hard for me to give you all the <br /> solutions tonight. I will require more time to look into some of <br /> the things. Some of the things we have heard tonight are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.