My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 10 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 10 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 2:06:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/15/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 10 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> -_.. <br /> spent a year and a half on this on each one of these <br /> areas. They have had probably at least 12 hours of <br /> discussion on them and I think they have sat down and <br /> listened to every aspect and every hypothetical situation <br /> there could possibly be on this. I can't think that we <br /> could get any better recommendation then that. We <br /> have had our chance to be able to give them <br /> recommendations and I have no idea why they felt the <br /> way that they did. I think the document needs to be <br /> evaluated this way alone and later on when it comes <br /> time for the amendments those will be your <br /> amendments and that would be fine. I am not sure <br /> when I look at your amendments that I agreed with all <br /> of it. So I have a problem with putting it out as <br /> something for public hearing because it is the Ethics <br /> Ordinance plus John's amendments. If you feel <br /> seriously about those, then you bring them in during the <br /> public hearing and they can be discussed at that point. <br />Sackett: Rather than take all night lets see if we can get a vote <br /> on that. It is all right if I make a motion? <br />Fauson: I was going to ask the co-chairpersons of the Ethics <br /> Committee if they would like to respond in any manner <br /> to what has been discussed regarding amendments in <br /> the publication for the public hearing? <br />Robert Lathrop, 245 Hoover Ct., Co-Chairperson of the Ethics Committee, Louisville, CO <br />Lathrop: I brought along a few comments as you can see. There <br /> are several things that I would like to bring up. We <br /> have spent, as of our last meeting, 545 man hours on <br /> this proposed ordinance. We have met 34 times. Our <br /> first meeting was in May 29, 1990, we last met on <br /> September 24, 1991. This is a very comprehensive <br /> complicated interwoven document. It is very difficult <br /> except for very specific things to pull something out or <br /> add something without changing the whole context of <br /> portions of the document or in some cases the whole <br /> document, especially in the forms of definitions. Several <br /> of the comments that were made this evening by <br /> Council are very appropriate, especially Mr. Davidson's <br /> comments about third parties if they happen to own a <br /> business in town, which of course is my concern. I was <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.