Laserfiche WebLink
�6¢ac+ <br />: n <br />OQp ��1 3�6 SS4 a F^ <br />F�OA�p. PaP A I' S a <br />F � , <br />\ `.. sw ar � '� f• Z fir. <br />`p\�' mva wmra <br />\ MµNF �°� Pa P` h 4Ff chi rcr.�L 4 wrc z�m o <br />} d%T <br />SEUENT TRAIL A�iGN[NT <br />MISS) sxlFTs NORM ro <br />AYOIE E%, <br />81TRAIL .r — — — <br />— <br />Figure 3. Site plan detailed view of main building. <br />The proposed Plat and Easement Vacation reduce the size of the existing drainage <br />easement, amend the existing Utility and Irrigation Easement, and remove reference to <br />the No Building Zone. <br />Finally, the proposed Annexation Agreement Amendment requests to remove the <br />existing No Building Zone recorded on the Annexation Agreement from 1986. The <br />removal of the No Building Zone would allow development anywhere on the property as <br />long as that development met zoning requirements (such as setbacks) or was granted <br />waivers from requirements through a PUD process. <br />.01 <br />OP LOT <br />a 4 LOT 1` <br />268 <br />0WILDING ZONE R( <br />(SEE NOTE NO. Z)N1' <br />aya`e <br />0 I// � cnaa_+ � g• <br />Figure 4. Existing plat referencing No Building Zone. The applicant proposes to remove the No Building Zone entirely via an <br />amendment to the Annexation Agreement. <br />Ironton PUD, SRU, Plat, Easement Vacation, & Annexation Agreement Amendment Page 5 of 20 <br />Planning Commission Staff Report <br />