Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />JULY 13, 2006 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br /> <br />within the Urban Renewal Area and to stimulate growth and reinvestment within the Area <br />boundaries, on surrounding blocks and throughout downtown. In particular, this Urban Renewal <br />Plan is intended to promote local objectives with respect to appropriate land uses, private <br />investment. . ." He summarized the remainder of the paragraph. <br /> <br />McAvinew thanked Lipton for the summary of the purpose. He stated that he supports the Plan. <br /> <br />Pritchard stated that he supports the document and now the City needs to be proactive. <br /> <br />Loo stated that she also supports the Plan. She encouraged the public to continue to express their <br />concerns to the groups that can take action, specifically LRC and City Council. <br /> <br />Sheets also supports the Plan and stated that she understands the fear of the unknown. She also <br />encouraged the public to continue to be active during the entire process. <br /> <br />Hartman stated that she does not support the Plan because it has no financial component and <br />does not provide a checks and balance system for the review process. <br /> <br />McA vinew stated that he supports the comment by Pritchard in the fact that "We have to be <br />bold" . <br /> <br />Loo moved and Pritchard seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 21, Series 2006 a <br />resolution finding the Highway 42 Revitalization Area Urban Renewal Plan to be in conformity <br />with the Comprehensive Plan and recommending approval of said Urban Renewal Plan. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton Yes <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br />Susan S. Loo Yes <br />Gail Hartman No <br />Hank Dalton Excused <br />Michael Deborski Recused <br />Monica Sheets Yes <br />Tom McA vinew Yes <br />Motion passed: 5 to 1 (1 excused and 1 recused) <br /> <br />8: 15 PM - Lipton declared a short break. <br /> <br />8:25 PM - Lipton called the meeting to order. <br /> <br />NOTE: Deborski returned to the room. <br /> <br />Lipton stated that he and Wood had discussed during the break that the representative for the <br />Clementine application, Rex Olson, Olson Studios would like to request a continuation to the <br />July 20, 2006 public hearing. <br /> <br />~ Resolution No. 24, Clementine Subdivision Filing No.2; A proposed three-lot final <br />subdivision replat at 333 East St. in a Residential Medium Density (RM) zoning <br />district. Proposed Lot summary: Lot lA - 0.7450 acres - existing 5,000 SF group <br />home SRU; Lot IB - 1.5530 acres - vacant; Lot lC - 0.6140 acres - vacant. The <br />