Laserfiche WebLink
1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions such as irregularity, <br />narrowness or shallowness of lot, or exceptional topographical or other physical <br />conditions peculiar to the affected property. Staff finds that this criterion is met. <br />The existing garage establishes the setback from the alley. Existing mature trees <br />also limit where additions to the garage can be built. <br />2. That the unusual circumstances or conditions do not exist throughout the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located. Staff finds that this <br />criterion is not applicable. This neighborhood was developed prior to the City's <br />adoption of zoning and subdivision regulations. There are many other lots and <br />structures in the immediate neighborhood which do not conform to the modern <br />development standards contained in the zoning ordinance. Redevelopment of these <br />properties often requires a variance. <br />3. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot <br />reasonably be developed in conformity with the provisions of Title 17 of the <br />Louisville Municipal Code. Staff finds that this criterion is met. The existing <br />garage is small and cannot accommodate two full size vehicles along with <br />providing reasonable storage space. The proposed garage after the additions will <br />not be excessively large. The proposed construction will comply with the <br />maximum lot coverage requirements of the zone district. <br />4. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the applicant. Staff finds <br />that this criterion is met. The location of the existing buildings on the property <br />were established long before the applicant owned this property. <br />5. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or <br />permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. Staff <br />finds that this criterion is met. The proposed design of the garage additions will <br />maintain the character of the neighborhood. Access to the garage is not from the <br />alley and will not conflict with the existing use of the alley. <br />6. That the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford relief and <br />is the least modification possible of the provisions of Title 17 of the Louisville <br />Municipal Code which are in question. Staff finds that this criterion is met. The <br />proposed addition continues established building lines. The proposed garage after <br />the additions will not be excessively large. The proposed construction will comply <br />with the maximum lot coverage requirements of the zone district. <br />2 <br />