Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 18, 2024 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />The Director of Parks, Recreation and Open Space commented that, at their meeting in May, the OSAB <br />will review a draft outline to provide feedback on the acquisition process and PROS staff will report back <br />to City Council with recommendations to improve the efficiency of the acquisition process. <br />Public Comments: <br />Louisville resident Helen Moshak commented that she supports the acquisition reserve recommendations <br />for Open Space (OS) funds. She asked to seed it with an allocation of $1.2M of additional year-end funds <br />referred to in the next report from the old conservation trust fund estimates to provide a foundation for <br />acquisitions. She asked the committee to consider general fund transfers to Open Space. She urged <br />council to consider a 20/80 split with 20% for acquisitions and 80% for unmet needs such as staff, <br />volunteer programs, wayfinding, permanent water rights for lakes and ponds for stable ecosystems, <br />resources for accelerated planning to make it happen in 2025. <br />Louisville resident Cathern Smith commented on the language in the financial policy where the staff <br />proposal is to eliminate Open Space's acquisition to fund transfers, partnerships, bond financing and <br />sound fiscal management. She expressed that the best management approach is to give yourself as City <br />Council a wide range of funding options which you may choose not to use so that OS is not limited to <br />money coming from the taxes. There is an interest in other programs using the OS funding in an <br />informal city-wide partnership with the potential for OS to bear the primary cost of the funding. She <br />strongly advocates for keeping a broad range of options so unanticipated issues can be addressed <br />nimbly and appropriately. She's advocating for broad policy, not necessarily for bond financing for open <br />space just to have it among the options to consider. <br />Matt Jones commented that he supports the acquisition recommendations. He feels that 20% for <br />acquisitions is more reasonable. He's concerned it is on autopilot and he asked what happens when you <br />hit the target and commented that there should be a number relative to what could be acquired when <br />they are available. He also commented that every time you remove money from the fund, the operations <br />work won't get done. He feels weed management is falling behind and he feels resources are needed to <br />address this issue. He commented that the capital reserve funding set aside that the general fund would <br />make up the difference of acquisitions. He doesn't want to lose sight of using general fund flexibility to <br />support acquisitions. <br />2023 EOY Revenues, Expenditures & Changes in Fund Balances (Cash Basis): <br />The Finance Director noted that this presentation is a snapshot in time from four months ago and <br />reminded the committee that some funds that were not expended in the previous year are often <br />intended to be expended in the following year. These charts do not include expenditures in 2024. <br />Financial Analyst Mansurabadi presented the 2023 EOY Revenues, Expenditures & Changes in Fund <br />Balances (Cash Basis). The reports were provided in the meeting packet. <br />Committee Comments: <br />7/90 <br />