My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2024 11 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDSCAPING ADVISORY BOARD (fka HORTICULTURE FORESTRY ADVISORY BOARD)
>
2024 Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2024 11 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2024 12:44:55 PM
Creation date
10/30/2024 12:06:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/6/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board <br />October 2, 2024 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />• Big -picture plan for all amenities (Parks, rec, open space, golf, etc.) for the <br />next 10 years <br />o Overdue as the last one was in 2012 <br />• RFP will be published for consultants (RFP draft included in packet) <br />• Due October 15th <br />• Variety of formats for public input <br />o On current and future needs <br />o Open Houses, discuss with advisory board - cycle of this over a few <br />times <br />• 12 - 18 month process w/consultant support <br />o Plan adoption targeting Q1 by Louisville City Council <br />• 2012: public noted that some departments received more attention than <br />others <br />o Division -by -division approach for attention across departments <br />o Budget amendments for trail -specific master plan <br />o Cottonwood/Lake Park + trails plan would be add -alternates for <br />separate budgets from LRP <br />■ Different expertise and teams looking at these various plans <br />but hoping for some cross -over <br />• Right now, structured that these can be given proposals <br />for individually (exception is the Trails plan) <br />• Ask for the bidding to outline costs for each project <br />Board Input: <br />• City Comprehensive plan on track for summer of next year <br />o Can leverage background from this extensive Comp planning and <br />public input <br />• Can frame RFP with timeline or calendar based on scope <br />• Does the division by division approach make sense? Is it confusing or need <br />more explanation? Staff Feedback: Yes, the approach is supported. <br />• PPLAB Feedback: Under 1.3 - look at commonalities across divisions (e.g. <br />mental health), include statement for Parks month into RFP, how can we <br />weave the story together across divisions to unite the City? How can the <br />consultants support common visual and planning elements across the city? <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.