Laserfiche WebLink
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board <br />October 2, 2024 <br />Page 8 of 12 <br />Re -greening certain areas? Thinking 10 years out, there may be more <br />density. <br />• RE: RFP Consultants criteria: Is there someone who has worked with <br />growing cities/areas and adaptation? Maturity models - practical and <br />operational. <br />• Leverage resources throughout the city <br />• Who takes ownership of certain cross -departmental projects (e.g. outdoor <br />amenities)? Make sure that nothing is left out, deciding ownership for <br />certain tasks. <br />• How can we work on certain items that lie in intersection? <br />o Note: other common Open Space / RAB meeting that PPLAB <br />members may ask to sit on <br />o Line items for holistic programs <br />o Trend analysis for technology (e.g. e-bikes) <br />• Does the framework of topics sufficiently cover your division? Are there <br />other topics that come to mind that we should include for your division or <br />others? <br />• PPLAB Feedback: consultants that understand natives, non -natives and <br />accommodations/practicality for climate change. <br />Staff Feedback: <br />• Ensure the inventory analysis includes outdoor rec amenities with bench <br />marking comparisons to national standards (NRPA?). We need to capture <br />all the on -going conversations about pickle ball, tennis, BMX, soccer, <br />multipurpose fields, softball, baseball, etc. <br />• Recreation and Senior Center would benefit from clarified direction/fiscal <br />policy related to cost recovery for programs and services. <br />o PPLAB Feedback: consultants that understand natives, non -natives <br />and what is happening was the environment changes <br />Does the outline of public input seem appropriate? Too much or too little? <br />• Parks Staff Feedback: Ensure Youth Advisory Board is included in the input <br />process. <br />10 <br />