My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 11 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2024 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 11 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2024 3:26:23 PM
Creation date
11/7/2024 4:25:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/14/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Staff find that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as it <br />allows for reinvestment while maintaining compatibility with existing <br />neighborhood character (Principle NH-4, p. 38). The request also addresses <br />the City's Housing Plan Goal 1 to Increase Residential Development <br />Opportunities (Housing Plan p. 4). <br />• Staff find that the request is consistent with the Highway 42 Framework Plan <br />which calls for no significant change to the Miners Field neighborhood, <br />recommending future development be consistent with R-M zoning densities <br />set at 12 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) (p. 46 of Framework Plan). The <br />proposed subdivision and subsequent future development of three single- <br />family homes is approximately 11 du/ac. <br />• Staff find that the application is consistent with all applicable zoning <br />requirements except where modifications have been requested as described <br />in this report. <br />3. Whether the proposed subdivision will promote the purposes set forth in section <br />16.04.020 of this Code and comply with the standards set forth in chapter 16.16 of <br />this Code and this title. <br />• Staff find that the application will promote the purposes in LMC 16.04.020, <br />including promoting orderly growth and harmonious development, protecting <br />the character of the city, and regulating the land on the basis of the impact <br />thereof on the surrounding area. <br />• Staff find that the application is consistent with all the standards set forth in <br />LMC Chapter 16.16 except in the requested modifications that are addressed <br />below in the Modification Criteria evaluation section. <br />Modification Criteria: <br />LMC Section 16.24.030 establishes the following criteria for consideration of <br />modifications to final plats; applications must also comply with LMC Section 16.04.020 <br />(Purpose, discussed above) and LMC Section 16.24.010 (Modifications). <br />1. LMC Section 16.24.010-Modifications: The city council, upon advice of the <br />planning commission, may authorize modifications where a subdivider proposes <br />a plat that does not fully comply with the regulations in this title or title 17. No <br />modification shall be granted if it would be detrimental to the public good or <br />impair the basic intent and purposes of this title or title 17. Any modification <br />granted shall be in keeping with the intent of the comprehensive development <br />plan of the city. <br />• The Residential Medium (R-M) and Old Town Overlay (OTO) zoning in Title <br />17 addresses neighborhood character through standards related to lot size, <br />lot width, and building mass, scale, and design. Title 16 (Subdivisions) <br />establishes minimum lot widths and depths for subdivisions. This proposal <br />includes modifications to lot size, lot width, and lot depth. However, those <br />modifications would have a minimal effect on density and mass, and no effect <br />on scale or design. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.