My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 1972-00 (5)
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
RESOLUTIONS (45.160)
>
1950-1999 Resolutions
>
1972 Resolutions
>
Resolution 1972-00 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 12:08:09 PM
Creation date
2/15/2008 1:26:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Resolution
Signed Date
8/1/1972
Ord/Res - Year
1972
Original Hardcopy Storage
7E5
Supplemental fields
Test
RES 1972-00 (5)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION N0. <br />A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH THE LOUISVILLE CITY <br />COUNCIL'S POSIT][ON REGARDING THE PROPOSED LAND <br />ACQUISITION BY THE U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has always had and continues to have a <br />deep interest in the presE:nt and planned activities of the U.S. Atomic <br />Energy Commission's Rocky Flats facility; and <br />WHEREAS, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission is planning to acquire <br />approximately 4,640 acres of land surrounding its existing Rocky Flats <br />facility and has prepared a draft Environmental Statement, dated January, <br />1972, which said Environmental Statement sets forth that the purpose of <br />said land acquisition is 1;o provide a one to one and one-half mile buffer <br />zone around the existing Rocky Flats facility and to provide a greenbelt <br />around said facility to preserve and enhance the ecological state of the <br />land and to help prevent 1;he cities of Denver and Boulder from merging into <br />a megalopolis; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed, in detail, the said Environmental <br />Statement and, based upon the assumption that the Rocky Flats facility will <br />remain in its present location, is of the opinion that the proposed land <br />acquisition by the U.S. Ai;omic Energy Commission is laudable but is also <br />of the opinion that the Environmental Statement is inadequate in several <br />respects and should contaiin the following provisions in order to assure the <br />integrity of purpose of the proposed project: <br />1. Assurances and guarantees that the 4,640 acres of land to be <br />acquired will remain perpE~tually in open space and will never be sub- <br />sequently sold and/or used for any other purposes; <br />2. A commitment to 'limitation on expansion of the Rocky Flats facility. <br />Guarantees should be made assuring that the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission <br />will not expand its Rocky Flats facility either into the land which is proposed <br />to be acquired or into that area of vacant land which presently surrounds <br />the Rocky Flats facility. Any such expansion of the facility would greatly <br />reduce any anticipated beneficial impact of the project. This concern is <br />interrelated with the concern of the City Council that any additional expansion <br />of the Rocky Flats facilitty could have an adverse environmental impact upon <br />the surrounding environs, including the City's domestic water storage supply, <br />the City of Louisville itself and the many neighboring communities. For <br />these reasons, it is the City Council's opinion that the U.S. Atomic Energy <br />Commission should not undertake any additional expansion of its Rocky Flats <br />facility. <br />3. A delineation of specificity of plans setting forth the extent of <br />development of said land as a greenbelt, setting forth the amount of land <br />to be left in its natural state, and setting forth the program which will be <br />needed for perpetual maintenance. The City Council wishes to express its <br />opinion and preference herein that the majority of said land be left in its <br />natural state; <br />4. Acost-benefit analysis with inclusion of quantitative measures. <br />Comparative values should be established in order to set forth a fully adequate <br />cost-benefit analysis; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.