My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2006 02 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2006 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2006 02 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:47 PM
Creation date
1/31/2007 1:31:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/7/2006
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2006 02 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> February 7, 2006 <br /> Page 13 of 18 <br />out of date concerning arboricultural standards and specifications and does not <br />provide for the licensing of tree care companies working within the city limits. <br />Licensing tree care companies protects citizens from improperly insured and <br />under-qualified companies who may have an unfair advantage over companies <br />who provide adequate levels of insurance, superior training and a safe working <br />environment. Many cities along the front range have adopted ordinances <br />mandating specific requirements for arboricultural practices, safety regulations <br />and licensing procedures. Those cities include: Denver, Lakewood, Aurora, <br />Wheat Ridge, Longmont, Ft. Collins, Greeley, and Englewood. <br />Additions to Chapter 8.12 reflect advancements in the profession of arboriculture <br />by adopting the most current industry standards and specifications. These <br />additions are limited to the creation of an arborist license issued by the City <br />mandating tree care companies are properly insured and required to operate <br />under federal safety and tree care standards. <br />Local tree care companies working in Louisville were notified of a January 19 <br />meeting where the City Forester would review those changes. Although no <br />companies attended, many of the local companies submitted letters of support of <br />the ordinance. This support illustrates the importance of these regulations to both <br />our community trees and those who take care of them. <br />Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearing and requested public comment. <br />Tom Davinroy, 518 W. Sycamore Circle, Louisville, CO stated he was contacted <br />by City Forester Chris Lichty last year because his trees hung over the bike path. <br />He reported Mr. Lichty was very professional and helpful in his suggestions, as <br />were the entire Horticulture Staff. He asked about the legal responsibility of <br />homeowners to maintain the community trees, and noted the community trees <br />affect all the citizens. <br />City Attorney Light explained the purpose statement is not intended to create a <br />separate enforceable obligation, but to introduce the general scope of the <br />chapter. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Muckle asked if there is a provision for the City to require <br />property owners to remove dangerous or diseased trees from their property. <br />City Forester Lichty reported on giving homeowners notice to remove such trees, <br />but never had any enforcement problems. He proposed in the future, the City <br />provide a cost sharing program for tree removal. He also noted, for the <br />residents' convenience, the City provides a tree branch drop-off area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.