Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> February 7, 2006 <br /> Page 13 of 18 <br />out of date concerning arboricultural standards and specifications and does not <br />provide for the licensing of tree care companies working within the city limits. <br />Licensing tree care companies protects citizens from improperly insured and <br />under-qualified companies who may have an unfair advantage over companies <br />who provide adequate levels of insurance, superior training and a safe working <br />environment. Many cities along the front range have adopted ordinances <br />mandating specific requirements for arboricultural practices, safety regulations <br />and licensing procedures. Those cities include: Denver, Lakewood, Aurora, <br />Wheat Ridge, Longmont, Ft. Collins, Greeley, and Englewood. <br />Additions to Chapter 8.12 reflect advancements in the profession of arboriculture <br />by adopting the most current industry standards and specifications. These <br />additions are limited to the creation of an arborist license issued by the City <br />mandating tree care companies are properly insured and required to operate <br />under federal safety and tree care standards. <br />Local tree care companies working in Louisville were notified of a January 19 <br />meeting where the City Forester would review those changes. Although no <br />companies attended, many of the local companies submitted letters of support of <br />the ordinance. This support illustrates the importance of these regulations to both <br />our community trees and those who take care of them. <br />Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearing and requested public comment. <br />Tom Davinroy, 518 W. Sycamore Circle, Louisville, CO stated he was contacted <br />by City Forester Chris Lichty last year because his trees hung over the bike path. <br />He reported Mr. Lichty was very professional and helpful in his suggestions, as <br />were the entire Horticulture Staff. He asked about the legal responsibility of <br />homeowners to maintain the community trees, and noted the community trees <br />affect all the citizens. <br />City Attorney Light explained the purpose statement is not intended to create a <br />separate enforceable obligation, but to introduce the general scope of the <br />chapter. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Muckle asked if there is a provision for the City to require <br />property owners to remove dangerous or diseased trees from their property. <br />City Forester Lichty reported on giving homeowners notice to remove such trees, <br />but never had any enforcement problems. He proposed in the future, the City <br />provide a cost sharing program for tree removal. He also noted, for the <br />residents' convenience, the City provides a tree branch drop-off area. <br />