My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2006 02 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2006 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2006 02 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:47 PM
Creation date
1/31/2007 1:32:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/21/2006
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2006 02 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> February 21, 2006 <br /> Page 6 of 13 <br /> City Attorney Light stated setbacks and fencing would be subject to the City's <br /> zoning code requirements. <br /> Council member Muckle asked Planning Director Wood what the floor area ratios <br /> (FAR) are for Old Town Louisville. Planning Director Wood stated it would <br /> depend on the size of the lot. <br /> Mayor Sisk voiced his appreciation of the comments from the audience. He <br /> explained after the Council made a decision last year on the street right-of-way, <br /> the City was sued by the Sawyers and Ehrmanns and he noted they did not have <br /> any other choice. The City hired special counsel who proceeded to investigate <br /> the history of the property. The case was ordered to mediation, where Judge <br /> Briggs heard both sides of the arguments. After considerable discussion, the <br /> City's Special Counsel and Judge Briggs indicated the City might not be <br /> successful in Court. At that time a settlement compromise was negotiated. <br /> COUNCIL DISCUSION: Mayor Pro Tem Brown voiced his hope the <br /> neighborhood could come together and be respectful of the settlement <br /> agreement. Council member Muckle explained the mediation process was long <br /> and arduous. Council member Sackett did not favor the provision of a plaque on <br /> a bench in the community park, but voiced his support of the ordinance. <br /> Damond Devincenzi, 1001 Rex Street, Louisville, CO stated the document has a <br /> discrepancy in the height of fencing along the corridor. He stated his <br /> understanding the fencing could be up to 6-feet, and the setback could be 30-feet <br /> in the right-of-way. He feared the fencing would block the view corridors. <br /> City Attorney Light explained the agreement indicates the fencing on both sides <br /> of the properties could not exceed 6-feet. He stated that a vacation ordinance <br /> does not include entitlements to the property. <br /> Mayor Sisk asked the City Attorney if a counter proposal could be made, which <br /> stipulated the fencing be 4-foot in height, and regulated the expansion of size <br /> and heights of the existing homes. City Attorney Light confirmed a counter <br /> proposal could be made and could also be addressed in a quit claim deed. <br /> Mayor Sisk reviewed the options: The resolution could be approved, and the <br /> ordinance brought back with revisions or the resolution could also be continued. <br /> City Attorney Light confirmed the resolution could be approved and the ordinance <br /> revised to include the fencing and setbacks. <br /> Tom Rafferty, 945 Rex Street, Louisville, CO requested the fencing and setback <br /> requirement be permanently attached to the properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.