Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> July 18, 2006 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />items that would be subject to the tax. A similar tax on building materials for all <br />residential construction was previously approved by the Louisville voters, and the <br />revenues received were ear-marked specifically for items related to capital <br />projects for schools and youth in Louisville. That tax expired in 2003 and voters <br />in 2003 defeated a proposal to extend the tax (Ballot issue 2A). <br />Finance Director Leslie reviewed the Use Tax Pocket Guide utilized in the <br />November 1, 2005 election. Updated financial information is required by <br />TABOR. With respect to the first ballot question on use tax, she estimated <br />$375,000 in revenues for the first year. On the second ballot question, new <br />construction of homes valued at $350,000 would generate $500 per new home. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Mayor Sisk asked how the tax would be collected. Finance Director Leslie stated <br />every business in Louisville would be registered and use tax would be submitted <br />just like sales tax. After the first six months, audits would be completed by the <br />Finance Department. <br />Mayor Pro T em Brown clarified existing homes would not be affected by the use <br />tax on new residential homes, but would be affected by any new purchases of <br />appliances and equipment. He supported the use tax. <br />Council member Yarnell noted the amenities the City provides and the quality of <br />life issues are important factors when considering the use tax. She was in <br />support of the use tax and educating the public as to its merits. <br />Council member Muckle concurred with other Council members comments. He <br />noted the Louisville Fire Protection District was very successful in their recent <br />election to increase the mill levy through public education. He stressed the <br />importance of educating the public. <br />Council member Sackett noted through budget process he recognized there is a <br />decline in sales tax, and a new revenue source is needed. He stated the City is <br />at a disadvantage by not having a use tax. He supported the use tax and <br />educating the public on the issues. <br />Council member Clabots supported the use tax ballot questions and noted <br />without the use tax, City services would have to be cut. <br />Mayor Sisk supported the use tax and stated the City provides services and <br />amenities, which characterize Louisville. He noted the City Attorney advises the <br />two questions could be combined under one question. He asked for Council's <br />preference on the whether there should be one or two ballot questions. He <br />asked City Attorney Light to outline the next steps in the process. <br />